Economics 0455/23 May/June 2023: question paper and mark scheme

Mark scheme

1(a) Calculate New Zealand’s GDP per head in 2020. 1 Accept the correct figure without the $ sign. $39 000 (1) 1(b) Identify two external costs arising from the milk and car 2 If more than two costs given, consider the first three. industries. Air pollution (1). Damages the environment (where wild animals live) (1). 1(c) Explain the impact on a cow farmer’s profits if they are 2 unable to find a different source of revenue. Profit is revenue minus costs (1) Profits will fall (1) due to reduction in quantity sold / decrease in supply (1). Less revenue (1) less income for farmers (1) farmers may become unemployed (1). 1(d) Explain the two plans that the New Zealand government 4 One mark each for each of two plans identified and one has to reduce external costs to the environment. mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: Accept milk production for keeping cows. End imports of petrol-powered cars by 2032 (1) decreasing the number of petrol−powered cars in New Zealand / reduce use of fossil fuels / by imposing an embargo/increasing the price of petrol-power cars / increasing usage of greener / electric cars (1). Limit the number of cows that each farmer can have (1) decreasing the amount of air pollution emitted by cows / less habitat damaged by cows / government fines to those who have more cows than permitted/ imposing regulations (1). 1(e) Draw a demand and supply diagram, to show the effect 4 of a cheaper substitute on the market for petrol- powered cars. Demand and supply diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or P and Q (1). Original demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). New demand curve shifted to the left (1). Equilibriums – shown by lines P1 and Q1 and P2 and Q2 or equilibrium points marked as E1 and E2 (1). 1(f) Analyse the relationship between a country’s share of 5 Responses do not have to be in the format suggested but world GDP (%) and its share of world carbon dioxide they should address the expected/normal relationship, offer emissions (%). supporting evidence of that, highlight any exceptions to that, and analyse the overall data. Coherent analysis which might include: Expected relationship: Positive relationship (1) – the lower / higher total GDP as a % of world GDP, the lower / higher the carbon dioxide emission as a % of world GDP (1). Supporting evidence: up to 2 marks for relevant evidence e.g. New Zealand has the lowest total GDP as a % of world GDP and lowest level of carbon dioxide emission as a % of world carbon dioxide emissions Thailand has the second lowest total GDP as a % of world GDP and second lowest level of carbon emissions as % of world carbon dioxide emissions China and USA have the two highest total GDP as a % of world GDP and highest level of carbon emissions as a % of world carbon dioxide emissions. Analysis of expected relationship: As countries produce more goods and services which increases their GDP (1), their carbon emissions also increase as more factories / energy / transport needed for production (1). Exception: China/United States (1) China has 2nd highest GDP as a % of world GDP after the US but China has the highest carbon dioxide emission as a % of world GDP (1). Analysis of exception: e.g. China has a larger secondary sector / higher percentage of heavy industries / larger population (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in exports of clean 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command and green products will help the New Zealand word DISCUSS government achieve its macroeconomic aims. (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an may include: argument, but separate development as to how/why the Increase economic growth / GDP (1) as increased outcome may differ is rewarded. exports lead to increased total demand (1) clean and green products may have higher demand (1) and higher Generic example mark prices (1) Reduce its current account of the balance of payment Tax revenue may decrease … 1 deficit (1) as value of exports will increase (1) increasing net exports (1) more inflow into the current account / ... because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 increase in trade in goods inflow (1) Decrease unemployment (1) as more goods produced Tax revenue may increase because incomes may 0 (1) requires more workers (1) reduce poverty (1) be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. Improved HDI (1). Tax revenue may increase because of a different 1 Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument which may include: e.g. government spending on subsidies may Not all firms benefit (1) as some firms which are less stimulate the economy more than spending on clean / green will lose revenues / profits (1) cut costs (1) education. hire less workers (1) increase unemployment (1) Increased total demand (1) will lead to inflation (1) firms increase the price of their products since demand is higher (1) lower purchasing power of consumers / lower real income (1). 1(h) Discuss whether or not job losses caused by a change 6 to a carbon−neutral economy will be harmful. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why there might be negative economic consequences, which may include: increased poverty (1) as fewer jobs means less income (1) can’t afford basic necessities (1) such as shelter / clothes / food (1) possibility of increased crime (1) huge losses in the other firms that serve these communities (1) less spending in local shops (1) less revenue / profit (1) may have to shut down (1) lost output (1) economy not producing at its full capacity (1) unused resources (1) actual output lower than maximum output (1) inefficient allocation of resources due to the existence of labour who wants to work but can’t find work (1) lost skills / lost motivation (1) occupational immobility /can't find new jobs (1) cost of retraining workers (1) double effect on government finances (1) unemployed don’t pay taxes (1) but get benefits (1) reduce government revenue (1) may decrease government expenditure on other areas (1) Unequal burden (1) structural unemployment (1) increases inequality (1) youth and older individuals more likely to be unemployed (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why negative economic consequences above may not occur: temporary (1) frictional unemployment (1) as other jobs in carbon−neutral economy are available (1) 1(h) an economy with a high mobility of factors of production could avoid such problems (1) workers can move to other industries (1) develop skills for jobs in the carbon−neutral economy (1) if education / training is provided (1). new jobs may be higher paid (1) boosting total demand (1) better air quality leads to better health (1) improving productivity (1) government spends less on health care (1) allowing more to be spent elsewhere e.g. on education and training (1).

Mark scheme

2(a) Identify two types of cost to a firm. 2 Accept any relevant costs e.g. labour cost Accept abbreviations e.g. TC total cost (1) average total cost (1) fixed cost (1) variable If more than two costs given, consider the first three. cost (1) average fixed cost (1) average variable cost (1) 2(b) Explain two roles of commercial banks for firms. 4 One mark each for each of two roles identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: Provide loans / overdrafts to banks / source of finance (1) to If more than two roles given, consider the first three. fund investments / expansion / start−up / day to day operations (1). Help process payments (1) internet banking / fund transfers / credit card / debit card payments (1). Issuing bank drafts / bank cheques (1) to help firms make payments (1). Safe place to store money / savings (1) firms making deposits / earn interest (1). Safekeeping of documents and other items (1) in safe deposit boxes (1). Currency exchange (1) to facilitate transfers between firms / international transactions (1). Provides insurance (1) to reduce various risks to the firm (1). 2(c) Analyse the causes of differences in the level of income 6 Alternatively, accept arguments which describes reasons for between countries. lower incomes. Coherent analysis which might include: difference in productivity (1) countries with higher productivity have higher incomes (1) as workers can produce more (1) and earn more money from their production (1) difference in availability of natural resources (1) e.g. valuable commodities such as oil or gold (1). difference in population growth (1) countries with higher population growth have higher incomes (1) as there are more people to produce goods and services (1) lower labour costs (1) encourage more investments (1) differences in distribution of primary, secondary and tertiary sectors / level of development (1) those with higher secondary and tertiary sectors have higher incomes (1) more value added (1) less dependent on weather (1) higher productivity (1) difference in specialisation / diversification (1) level of exports (1). difference in minimum wage level (1) affects the level of total demand in a country (1) difference in level of saving and investment (1) higher savings leads to higher investment (1) and higher productivity growth (1) and therefore higher income growth (1) difference in education levels (1) higher education levels lead to higher incomes (1) workers have more qualification / skills / experience (1) leading to higher productivity / higher output (1) 2(c) difference in health / healthcare standards (1) higher health / healthcare standards lead to higher incomes (1) less sick / healthier / stronger (1) produce more / higher productivity leading to higher income (1). difference in unemployment rates (1) the more unemployed resources a country has, the less income is likely to be earned (1). differences in birth rates / proportion of elderly people (1) high birth rate and ageing population may place high demands on a country's resources (1) difference in frequency of war / natural disasters (1) reducing a country’s ability to produce goods and services (1) 2(d) Discuss whether or not low tax rates benefit an 8 Level Description Marks economy. 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6−8 In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic Why it might: information and clear and logical analysis low corporation tax rates encourage more investments to evaluate economic issues and and therefore higher productivity growth which situations. One side of the argument may encourages economic growth have more depth than the other, but overall low corporation tax rates encourage more investments both sides of the argument are considered which increases demand for labour and reduces and developed. There is thoughtful unemployment evaluation of economic concepts, low income tax rates encourage more people to enter terminology, information and/or data the labour force appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible low income tax rates increase disposable income which uncertainties of alternative decisions and can encourage higher consumer expenditure and, as a outcomes. result, higher output low indirect tax rates reduce cost of production which 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of 3−5 reduces cost−push inflation economic information and clear analysis to low indirect tax rates reduce cost of production which evaluate economic issues and situations. increases competitiveness of exports which reduces The answer may lack some depth and current account deficit / increases current account development may be one−sided. There is surplus relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data Why it might not: appropriate to the question. low tax rates reduce government revenues which could reduce spending on public goods / infrastructure, 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1−2 reducing investments / productivity growth economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic low tax rates increase production which increases theory, with occasional understanding. pollution and environmental degradation low direct tax rates may be inflationary 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no 0 creditable content. 2(d) low tax rates increase trade which increases need for international transport such as ships and planes which increases pollution low direct tax rates increase inequality low tax rates on demerit goods may worsen health / result in market failure. low tax rates on imports (tariffs) may worsen the current account of the balance of payments

Mark scheme

3(a) Identify two challenges facing small firms. 2 If more than two challenges given, consider the first three. Two from: Accept any reasonable challenges facing small firms. Raising finance (1) May not be able to employ specialist staff (1) Less well known (1) Managing cash flow (1) Survival / may have high level of competition (1) Not able to take advantage of economies of scale / high average cost (1) 3(b) Explain two possible opportunity costs for firms if they 4 One mark each for each of two opportunity costs identified invest in the latest technology. and one mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: If more than two opportunity costs given, consider the first They may not be able to pay as much in wages (1) forgoing three. having extra workers to help in their business / more skilled workers (1) They may not be able to get good quality raw materials (1) sacrificing the quality of their product (1) They may not be able to operate in a good location (1) more difficult for customers to reach the firm (1) They may not be able to buy land (1) for expansion (1) They may not be able to spend on advertising / marketing / spending on the brand (1) forgoing the opportunity to increase demand (1) Retained profits (1) could have been distributed to the owners (1) 3(c) Analyse two causes of a fall in demand for a product 6 If more than two causes given, consider the first three. such as Chinese food. Coherent analysis which might include: Decrease in price of substitutes / better quality substitutes (1) increasing demand for substitutes (1) such as Indian food or other kinds of food (1) there may be an increase in the advertising of substitutes / better known rivals may enter the market (1). Increase in the price of complements (1) e.g. delivery charges (1) Decrease in income (1) decreasing demand for Chinese food as people eat out less (1) as eating out is seen as luxury goods (1). Change in tastes / trends moving away from Chinese food (1) increasing demand for other types of food (1) Decrease in quality of Chinese food (1) lack of investments (1) may be a health report about the advantages of eating another type of food (1). Lack of advertising (1) due to little investments in marketing (1) less popular / less awareness of product (1). 3(d) Discuss whether or not competition is harmful to a firm. 8 Level Description Marks In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6−8 examines both sides of the economic Why it might be: argument, making use of economic reduction in market share information and clear and logical analysis less revenues / less profits to evaluate economic issues and less growth situations. One side of the argument may less reinvested profits – less innovation have more depth than the other, but overall may need to lower prices / spend more in order to both sides of the argument are considered compete and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, may be difficult to enter or stay in an industry if there are terminology, information and/or data large firms with low average costs appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible Why it might not be: uncertainties of alternative decisions and less complacency outcomes. more innovation increase quality of goods and services produced 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of 3−5 domestic competition leads to international economic information and clear analysis to competitiveness evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one−sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1−2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no 0 creditable content.

Mark scheme

4(a) Define emigration. 2 Emigration is when people exit / leave (1) a country (1) to live in another country (1). 4(b) Explain two causes of a recession. 4 If more than two causes given, consider the first three. Logical explanation which might include: Fall in total demand / low economic activity (1) due to lower consumer confidence / falling consumption / falling government spending / falling exports / increase imports (1) Fall in investment (1) leading to fall in productive capacity (1) Fall in population (1) e.g. due to emigration (1) leading to a fall in number of workers (1) Wars / natural disasters (1) causing destruction of factors of production (1) Higher interest rates (1) leading to lower borrowing / consumption / investments (1) Decreased consumer / investor confidence (1) decreasing consumption / capital flight (1) Higher income / corporation taxes (1) leading to falling disposable income for consumption / falling after tax profits leading to lower investments (1) Lower productivity (1) reducing demand for the country’s output (1). 4(c) Analyse policy measures a government could use to 6 attract workers to return to their home country. Coherent analysis which might include: Increase national minimum wage (1) attract more unskilled / low−paid workers to return (1). Expansionary fiscal policy / expansionary monetary policy (1) to increase job opportunities (1). Improved education / healthcare / housing (1) higher pensions (1) to raise living standards (1). Better working conditions / quality of life (1) regulations to protect workers from poor treatment (1) better fringe benefits e.g. holiday entitlement Greater security in the country (1) e.g. gun controls (1) Labour market reforms (1) making it easier for firms to hire (1) more job opportunities (1) people return to take up a job (1). Lower direct taxes (1) increase after−tax income / disposable income (1) could encourage more people to work (1) and return to the country to earn income (1). Deregulation (1) encourages more firms to start up (1) more entrepreneurs will want to start a business (1) encouraging more people to return to start their own business (1). Improving incentives to work and invest (1) more investments (1) more demand for workers (1) more job opportunities (1). Measures to reduce inflation (1) making lower cost of living attractive (1) 4(d) Discuss whether or not an economy benefits from many 8 Level Description Marks of its students studying abroad. 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6−8 In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic Why it might: information and clear and logical analysis other countries may have better education system to evaluate economic issues and enabling students to gain better skills / experiences situations. One side of the argument may when students return to the country, there will be higher have more depth than the other, but overall productivity i.e. quality of factors of production increases both sides of the argument are considered learn about new technologies which could help the and developed. There is thoughtful domestic economy in the future evaluation of economic concepts, make connections abroad which could help establish terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion future business contacts may also point out the possible new ideas / products which could be brought back for uncertainties of alternative decisions and the domestic economy outcomes. decrease poverty leads to further economic development. 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of 3−5 less spent on education by government economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. Why it might not: The answer may lack some depth and students studying abroad might not return and stay in development may be one−sided. There is the country they studied in (brain drain) relevant use of economic concepts, studying abroad is very expensive and lots of money is terminology, information and data spent abroad instead of in the domestic economy appropriate to the question. (money outflow) 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1−2 only a small proportion of the society can afford economic definitions and terminology. studying abroad increasing inequality Some reference may be made to economic Lack of development of higher / university education in theory, with occasional understanding. the country due to lack of demand. If inflow of students from abroad is larger than outflow of 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no 0 students, then there may not be a problem. creditable content. loss of potential consumption / growth in home country unemployment of teachers / lecturers in the country, costs to government in benefits

Mark scheme

5(a) Define government budget. 2 Government budget is a plan / forecast (1) for government expenditure (1) and government revenue (1) 5(b) Explain, with examples, the difference between private 4 benefits and external benefits. Logical explanation which might include: Private benefits are benefits incurred by the consumers or producers of a product (1) for example, getting a better job in the future for those consuming education / profits that a firm earns (1) External benefits are benefits incurred by the third party (1) for example, increased productivity due to better education and better healthcare as a result of better qualified doctors (1) 5(c) Analyse the reasons why workers employed in 6 education may earn more than workers employed in other industries. Coherent analysis which might include: Higher demand for education workers (1) due to higher demand for education than other industries (1) demand for education workers is derived demand (1). Lower supply (1) less people available to work in education (1) e.g. not many qualified people want to become teachers / lecturers (1). Higher bargaining strengths (1) stronger trade unions (1) e.g. teachers’ union is very strong. Less discrimination (1) everyone is paid according to their level of productivity (1) for example, female teachers less discriminated than in other industries (1). More favourable government policy for workers in education / government spends more on education (1) higher wages set by the government for workers in education (1) as education is essential for the economy / society (1). More skilled (1) long-term training required (1) higher productivity (1). tertiary workers earn more (1) more value added (1). 5(d) Discuss whether or not having a large population is 8 Level Description Marks beneficial for the economy. 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6−8 In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic Why it might: information and clear and logical analysis high labour supply – higher levels of factors of to evaluate economic issues and production – high productive capacity – PPC shifts situations. One side of the argument may outwards have more depth than the other, but overall workers can be taxed − enabling spending on public both sided of the argument are considered services and developed. There is thoughtful high spending leads to high total demand –high evaluation of economic concepts, economic growth terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion high investment as firms can gain more profit may also point out the possible high investment as firms can easily find more workers uncertainties of alternative decisions and high competition amongst workers – high quality / outcomes. productivity of workers many entrepreneurs – increased competition – 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of 3−5 increased innovation economic information and clear analysis to high demand for goods and services – increased output evaluate economic issues and situations. of firms – economies of scale. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one−sided. There is Why it might not: relevant use of economic concepts, strain on resources – e.g. lack of proper housing, terminology, information and data schools, hospitals appropriate to the question. external costs – e.g. pollution 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1−2 high total demand could lead to increase demand−pull economic definitions and terminology. inflationary pressures Some reference may be made to economic shortage of jobs – increased unemployment theory, with occasional understanding. it depends upon the composition of the population e.g. large proportion of under 5's will not increase output in 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no 0 the short run. creditable content.