Free until 14 Nov · 80% off for the first 100 · Pricing

Business 9609/31 October/November 2019: question paper and mark scheme

Cambridge AS & A Level Business (9609), Paper 3 Case Study, October/November 2019. Read both free below, or download them. Done the paper? Get it marked by AI against this mark scheme.

9609_w19_qp_319609_w19_ms_319609/31/O/N/19

Paper
Paper 3 Case Study
Total marks
100
Time
3 hours
Code on the paper
9609/31/O/N/19
9609_w19_ms_31.pdf

9609/31 mark scheme, question by question

Each question as it's printed, and the mark scheme's points for it, as text. Diagrams, tables and graphs are in the PDFs above.

Question 0

Question

In the question paper above.

Mark scheme

0 No creditable content

Question 110 marks

Question

Analyse the advantages to QH of its HRM policy. …… [10]

Mark scheme

1 Analyse the advantages to QH of its HRM policy. 10 Level Knowledge Application Analysis 3 marks 2 marks 5 marks 2 3 marks 2 marks 3–5 marks Two or more relevant Points made are Good use of theory to points made about applied to QH explain benefits benefits 1 1–2 marks 1 mark 1–2 marks One or two relevant Some application to Some use of theory to points made about QH explain benefits benefits 0 No creditable content Examiners note: • Disadvantages should not be rewarded • Benefits should relate to QH, not, e.g. to employees or other stakeholders Knowledge • HRM Policy, Supportive HRM culture and general advantages • Democratic/paternalistic leadership • Soft versus hard HRM and general advantages of soft HRM • Team working and advantages • Employee training and advantages • Meaning of self-motivation • Employee involvement and advantages • Employee payment policy and advantages Application • Soft HRM approach of QH management shown by workers choosing own team leaders, etc. • Could include specific reference to team working to manufacture house kits • Supportive culture, training, selection procedure, ideas box, team bonuses Analysis • Motivation leading to increased efficiency, higher quality, deadlines met • Personal interest by Min leads to greater commitment, less labour turnover • Good training leads to lower wastage rates, lower labour turnover • Bonus payments encourage faster working leading to customer satisfaction • Ideas box leads to lower costs, innovation, faster working and therefore increased profit or more competitive pricing • Impact of supportive culture leads to more commitment, lower wastage rates, less labour turnover 1 1–2 marks 1–2 marks 1–2 marks 1–3 marks Some Some Limited use of Limited attempt to show judgment understanding application reasoned either within the answer shown to QH argument or use OR of theory to a weakly supported support points conclusion/recommendation with some made focus on QH

Question 218 marks

Question

(a) Refer to Appendix A below (reproduced from the insert). Appendix A: Network for assembling a kit house B H 1 2 0 A C E F 1 2 3 4 5 0 3 2 1 2 D G 2 3 Activity Description A Build foundations B Walls unpacked and prepared for assembly C Assemble walls D Roof unpacked and prepared for assembly E Assemble and fit roof F Install plumbing G Install electrics H Install windows and doors Calculate: (i) total duration of house assembly …… [2] (ii) free float of activity H …… [2] (iii) total float of activity F. …… [2] (b) Evaluate the role of critical path analysis (CPA) in meeting QH’s quality targets. …… [12]

Mark scheme

2(a) Refer to Appendix A. Calculate: 3 5 6 9 3 5 6 9 2(a)(i) Examiners note – check diagram for figures, may need for OFR in (ii) and 2 (iii), or may have entered CP on diagram. total duration of house assembly Critical path = A – C – E – G (1 mark) OR 3+2+1+3 (1 mark) 9 (days) (2 marks) Units not required 2(a)(ii) free float activity H 2 Examiners note – check diagram for OFR Free float is max. time an activity can be delayed without delaying the next activity OR EST next activity – duration – EST (1 mark) 9 – 2 – 5 = 2 (days) Units not required 2(a)(iii) total float activity F 2 Examiners note – check diagram for OFR Total float is max. time an activity can be delayed without delaying whole project OR LFT – duration – EST (1 mark) LST of next activity – duration – EST 9 – 2 – 6 = 1 (day) Units not required 2(b) Evaluate the role of critical path analysis (CPA) in meeting QH’s quality 12 targets. Level Knowledge Application Analysis Evaluation 2 marks 2 marks 3–4 marks 3–4 marks 2 2 marks 2 marks 3–4 marks 3–4 marks Two or more Application of Good use of Good judgment relevant two or more theory to answer shown points points to QH question 1 1 mark 1 mark 1–2 marks 1–2 marks One relevant Some Some use of Some judgment point made application to theory to answer shown QH question 0 No creditable content Examiners note – if only comment on methods of meeting quality targets then L1 AN and EVAL maximum Knowledge • CPA and network diagrams and uses – Meeting deadlines – Planning resources – Simultaneous completion of tasks • Methods of meeting quality targets – Quality control/assurance/TQM Application • QH targets – house built in 9 days – duration 9 days, floats • Min is concerned that 12% not completed on time and the defect rate • Reference to activities and durations/critical/non-critical activities • On site supervisor checks each task – form of quality control Analysis • CPA indicates that houses should be complete within 9 day guarantee, allows simultaneous completion of tasks saving time and resources so making it more likely that this quality target is met • CPA allows more effective management of resources so that quality target is more likely to be met • On site supervisor can use CPA to ensure that house building is on schedule and take action if 2(b) Evaluation • There are quality standards but these are not well explained nor specific. No explicit reference in the CPA. How much time does quality assurance take? Is it included in the timings? • CPA minimum duration is the target so any holdup will mean target not met so is the target too strict? Is 12% reasonable? • CPA does not address targets re defects • No indication that bonuses are impacted by defect rates • May need different quality control/assurance methods not related to CPA, e.g. workers at each stage check quality (profit centres?) • Is the information in the CPA (duration of activities) accurate? 2 3 marks 3 marks 3–4 marks 4–6 marks Good Good Good use of Some judgment shown in the main understanding application reasoned body of the answer and an attempt to shown to QH argument or use support conclusion/recommendation, of theory to focused on QH explain points OR made to explain effective and well supported points made conclusion/recommendation focused on QH

Question 316 marks

Question

Discuss the possible effects on QH of the changes to the macroeconomic policies as announced by the Finance Minister of Country Z. …… [16]

Mark scheme

3 Discuss the possible effects on QH of the changes to the macroeconomic 16 policies as announced by the Finance Minister of Country Z. Level Knowledge Application Analysis Evaluation 2 marks 2 marks 6 marks 6 marks 2 2 marks 2 marks 4–6 marks 4–6 marks Two or more Application of Good use of theory Good judgment relevant two or more to answer question shown points points to QH 1 1 mark 1 mark 1–3 marks 1–3 marks One relevant Some Some use of Some judgment point made application to theory to answer shown QH question 0 No creditable content Examiners note – answer should focus on effects on QH. This question is about policies, not indicators in table 2, although information in table 2 may support points Answers could include: Explanation of the operation of the polices and their possible effects Knowledge • Income tax – direct tax on earnings • Interest rates – cost of borrowing/reward for savings • Subsidies for exporters – government payment to encourage increase in exports. Reduces costs. • Sales tax – indirect tax on spending, increases prices • Tax on land developed for housing – indirect tax making development more expensive Application • Homes often bought on borrowed money • QH considering exporting • QH homes cost over $1000 • Taxing land for house building will raise cost of land for houses • Linking policies to indicators in Table 2 (these are actual rather than forecast) – Increasing interest rates to reduce inflation which has been increasing – Increasing interest rates would lead to appreciation of exchange rate (other things being equal) – Increasing interest rates may exacerbate slowdown in economic growth – Higher rate of income tax would reverse current trend of proportion of income tax collected from higher earners 3 Analysis • High earners likely to buy QH homes as major spending (or not as QH homes are cheap) so higher income tax might decrease QH sales or have no effect • Increase in interest rates raises cost of loans so house sales fall • Increase in interest rates may mean higher costs for QH if borrowing needed for materials • Export subsidies lower cost of exporting so QH more likely to decide to export • Higher purchase tax increases cost of homes so QH sales fall • Tax on house building land increases cost of housing land so QH sales fall Evaluation • Effects may depend on other policies or macroeconomic changes, e.g. changes in exchange rates, competition • The forecast data does not take into account the policy changes, which are not known quantitatively • The proposed policy changes may not be implemented • If the forecasts are accurate then higher unemployment, inflation, interest rates and lower economic growth are likely to reduce QH sales, as might the increase in tax % paid by richest 10% • If successful likely that unemployment goes higher, inflation falls, growth falls so QH sales reduced by more • Effect on exchange rate difficult to assess, possibly higher interest rates will reduce the rate of decrease • Proposed government policy changes are in line with the forecasters view. To what extent will the forecast be accurate? 3 7–10 marks Good judgment shown throughout with well supported conclusion/recommendation, focused on QH

Question 420 marks

Question

(a) Refer to Table 1. Calculate: (i) payback period …… [2] (ii) accounting rate of return (ARR) …… [3] (iii) net present value (NPV). …… [3] (b) Refer to your results from 4(a) and any other information. Discuss whether QH should purchase the new machinery. …… [12]

Mark scheme

4(a)(i) Refer to Table 1. Calculate: 2 payback period payback period is the time it takes to recover the initial investment (1 mark if no relevant calculation) Up to Year 3 pays back 290 Remainder needed = 60 1 mark Payback in 4th year 1 mark 60 / 90 = 0.66 OR 0.67 therefore 3.67 years OR 3 years 8 months (or between 241 and 243 days) 2 marks Units must be stated for full marks. Thus, 3.67 1 mark 4(a)(ii) accounting rate of return (ARR) 3 Units required for full marks ARR = annual profit / capital cost × 100 (1 mark if no relevant calculation) Total profit: 380 000 – 350 000 = ($)30 000 1 mark Annual profit: 380 k – 350 k / 4 = 7.5 k 2 mark 7.5 × 100 / 350 = 2.14% 3 marks Common errors: No deduction of capital cost: 380 / 4 = ($)95 000 1 mark 95 000 / 350 000 × 100 = 27.1(%) 2 marks Annual profit not calculated: ($)30 000 1 mark 30 000 / 350 000 × 100 = 8.57(%) 2 marks .2.14 2 marks If any of above answers are stated without working marks can still be awarded 4(a)(iii) Net present value (NPV). 3 Examiners note – units required for full marks and must be negative NPV = Total of discounted cash flows – original investment (1 mark if no correct calculation) Use of discount factor Yr0 (350) Yr1 96.2 Yr2 92.5 Yr3 80.01 Yr4 76.95 1 mark Summed discounted cash flows: ($)345 660 2 marks –4.34 OR (4.34) OR –$4.34 OR ($4.34) 2 marks NPV = 345.66 – 350 = –$4340 OR ($4340) 3 marks 4(b) Refer to your results from 4(a) and any other information. Discuss whether 12 QH should purchase the new machinery. Level Knowledge Application Analysis Evaluation 2 marks 2 marks 3–4 marks 3–4 marks 2 2 marks 2 marks 3–4 marks 3–4 marks Two or more Application of Good use of Good judgment relevant two or more theory to answer shown points points to QH question 1 1 mark 1 mark 1–2 marks 1–2 marks One relevant Some Some use of Some judgment point made application to theory to answer shown QH question 0 No creditable content Examiners note: • Own figure rule from 4 applies • Maximum L1 for AN and EVAL if only 4(a) or other information used Knowledge Understanding of relevant factors • Investment appraisal methods, (discounted) payback, ARR, IRR, NPV • Availability of finance • Impact on employees • Impact on quality • Cost of investment • Existing machinery at end of useful life/more efficient machinery available Application • Results from 4(a), – NPV is negative. Not profitable when discount rate applied at 4% – ARR lower than rate of interest – Payback in 4th year and investment appraisal suggests a useful life of only 4 years? • Special offer on price requiring decision within a week • Existing machinery reaching end of useful life • Greater efficiency of new machinery. This would increase the profit margin on the $80 per square metre selling price • May enable QH to export abroad which they are considering • Data in Table 1 • New government policies, especially interest rate 4(b) Analysis • Quantitative data indicates non-acceptance as NPV is negative, ARR lower than interest rate which is likely to rise • Inflation indicates replacing machines in future likely to be more expensive • Special price could be much lower than price next month so agreeing a contract now will reduce the cost of investment • Greater potential output will enable expansion and QH to export abroad thus increasing sales and profit Evaluation • Justified recommendation • Does QH have a choice as existing machinery is reaching end of usable life • If lifetime of new machinery is longer than four years then NPV may be positive • Quantitative data relies on accurate forecasting of costs • Inflation indicates savings if replace now (does overall inflation figure apply to this type of machinery? • Better to wait to get more technical advancements in machinery? • Are new machines capable of greater quality?

Question 516 marks

Question

Recommend which method of market entry QH should use to start selling houses in the European market. …… [16] Section B Answer one question in this section.

Mark scheme

5 Recommend which method of market entry QH should use to start selling 16 houses in the European market. Level Knowledge Application Analysis Evaluation 2 marks 2 marks 6 marks 6 marks 2 2 marks 2 marks 4–6 marks 4–6 marks Two or more Application of Good use of Good judgment relevant two or more theory to answer shown points points to QH question 1 1 mark 1 mark 1–3 marks 1–3 marks One relevant Some Some use of Some judgment point made application to theory to answer shown QH question 0 No creditable content Examiners note – This is about method of entry into Europe NOT whether QH should enter the market. In the case of franchising, QH would be the franchisor. Do not reward references to QH as a franchisee of a European company Knowledge Entry methods explained • Franchise – license to sell franchisor’s product/service • Direct investment – setting up own manufacturing plant in new market • Joint venture – selling product/service in agreement with another business, usually local to market • Agent – selling through independent representative in new market • Direct exporting – selling to individual customers in new market Application • Wooden house kits • Requirements of European market (meeting building regulations) • Exchange rate depreciation will impact costs depending on method of entry, e.g. direct exporting vs. direct investment • QH no links with European developers, builders or governments • High cost rules out direct exporting • Possible export subsidies • Shipping costs 5 Analysis Advantages and disadvantages of the proposed methods: Advantages Disadvantages Franchise or Lower set up cost Risk to QH reputation if licensing Trade barriers may be franchisee does not maintain reduced standards Franchisee will pay upfront Sharing profits for operating the franchise and royalties Local expertise Direct Higher profit margins High set-up costs Investment Full control of marketing More market research than and operations franchising or joint venture as Avoids trade barriers new to the market Joint Venture Risks shared Not full control Local expertise available Possible disagreements Possible loss of industrial secrets Evaluation • Recommendation on method with justification • Ranking of methods • Conditional recommendation – Depends on availability of finance (for direct investment) – Suitable joint venture companies (with experience of kit houses) – Depends on exchange rate movements, e.g. direct investment • Depends on existence and nature of any trade barriers in Europe • Begin sounding out possible partners for each method and/or contact European government agencies without committing large resources • Contact government in Z for possible help/assistance (possible export subsidies) Questions 6 and 7 use this marking grid: Level Knowledge Application Analysis Evaluation 3 marks 3 marks 4 marks 10 marks

Question 6

Question

Evaluate whether the strategic analysis undertaken by Artur is sufficient to provide QH with a framework for business strategy.

Mark scheme

6 Evaluate whether the strategic analysis undertaken by Artur is sufficient to 20 provide QH with a framework for business strategy. Examiners note – This is not a question about strategic choice (to expand into steel houses). An answer that uses SA to make a choice should be limited to L1 AN & EVAL Knowledge • Strategic analysis is the process that provides information to enable strategic choices to be made • Strategic analysis uses 5 techniques – SWOT, PEST, Boston Matrix, Porter’s Five Forces, Core Competencies and a consideration of vision/mission statements • Place of strategic analysis in strategic management Application • Use of Appendix B information • Established reputation will improve chances of success in (steel) market • High gearing ratio will impact ability to borrow for expansion and risk • Porter’s Five Forces looks favourable as power of seller, threat of substitutes and threat of new entrants are all low • PEST or Boston matrix carried out • Reference to core competency of QH, e.g. specialist supplier of complete wooden homes • Relative price of steel compared to wood houses: $100 to $80 per square metre • Steel houses last longer, more expensive to insulate refs? • New equipment, skills, labour, premises needed Analysis • SWOT analysis enables a business to make a judgement about the balance of internal and external factors that will impact strategy • More research needed into costs, foreign competition • Porter’s Five Forces looks favourable as power of seller, threat of substitutes and threat of new entrants are all low therefore suggesting that competitive rivalry is low. Potential for first mover advantage in this market • PEST analysis – P has government action, e.g. the changes to macro policies plus indicators in Table 1 showing possible decline in demand • Core competency is house supply so new product fits well • Place of strategic analysis as part of strategic management process. Gives direction for choosing possible options to consider • Discussion of how techniques are a framework for strategy, e.g. identifying strengths to build on or weaknesses that should be addressed 6 Evaluation • What else is needed to provide a framework for strategy? Are these two techniques enough? • All analysis relies on accurate data • Analysis gives clear indications on which to base a decision but insufficient • All techniques are more qualitative than quantitative so further information required • Porter’s Five Forces analysis that is provided is basic and lacks detail • Little financial information in techniques • Results may depend on the attitude of the person preparing them • Must carry out the rest of strategic management, not just rely on analysis

Question 720 marks

Question

Assume QH has decided to manufacture and sell steel framed houses. Evaluate the importance of developing a strategy to manage this change. Write the question number here: …… …… [20]

Mark scheme

7 Assume QH has decided to manufacture and sell steel framed houses. 20 Evaluate the importance of developing a strategy to manage this change Examiners note – There are two possible approaches to answering this question, both of which are equally rewardable: Approach 1 – strategy for manufacturing and selling new product which is steel house (mark scheme suggests points for this approach) Approach 2 – importance of managing the change in the QH organisation, given this diversification Approach 2 answers might consider the role of culture in an organisation and/or the techniques for making change happen successfully, e.g. communication of changes, overcoming resistance, involving employees, Kotter’s 8 steps, getting key individuals on board Knowledge • Strategic management is using corporate strategy and tactics, encompassing setting objectives, strategic analysis, choice and implementation to achieve the objectives • Coordinated strategies for functional areas • Strategy can determine a business’ competitive advantage and how successful it is • Chandlers’ assertion that strategy determines structure may be relevant Application • New product/addition to product range • Price and characteristics of steel houses • Need for more equipment, employees and premises • Existing product portfolio • Reference to data in Appendix B Analysis • Contrast between a strategic approach and no strategy • Need for integration of functional area strategies – examples of result of integration and/or non-integration • Reasons for each stage of preparing a strategy including review and contingency • Strategy could help decide how to place the new project in company structure – as a separate department or not? 7 Evaluation • Strategic approach provides a timetable for each necessary process and maximises chances of success • Difficult to see how the changes needed to enter the new market could happen in a coordinated way if there was no strategy • Avoids conflicts between managers • Major new venture requiring significant investment requires thorough planning • Strategy enables communication between functional areas and existing product areas to maximise efficiency • Requires objectives to be set – very important • Supported conclusion on role of strategic management • Relative importance of constituent sections of strategic management • Necessity of review/updating strategy • Importance of accurate reliable data/information .

Checked your answers against these? Let AI mark the whole paper, on your own working.

Mark my 9609/31

How this paper is marked

Examiners follow the generic marking principles at the front of the scheme, then each question's points: method (M), accuracy (A) and independent (B) marks, error carried forward where the scheme allows it, and positive marking, so you're credited for what you got right.

Check your answers against it

Done this paper? Upload your script and CIE Buddy's AI marker marks it question by question against this exact scheme, puts the ticks on your own working and says what each lost mark needed.

9609/31 in other series

Find another Business paper

Every AS & A Level Business mark scheme

Question papers and mark schemes © Cambridge University Press & Assessment. CIE Buddy is independent and not connected to Cambridge.

9609/31 questions

Where can I find the 9609/31 October/November 2019 mark scheme?

On this page, free: the mark scheme for AS & A Level Business 9609/31, October/November 2019 (9609_w19_ms_31), and the question paper (9609_w19_qp_31), to read or download, with each question's marking points written out underneath.

How many marks is 9609/31 out of?

Business 9609/31 for October/November 2019 is out of 100 marks, with 3 hours to answer it.

Can I get my 9609/31 answers marked?

Yes. Upload your answers to 9609/31/O/N/19 as a PDF or photos, and CIE Buddy marks every question against this paper's official mark scheme, using Cambridge's marking rules. You get your score, each lost mark explained on your own script, and the topics to revise. It's a guide, not an official Cambridge grade.