Free until 14 Nov · 80% off for the first 100 · Pricing

Biology 9700/51 May/June 2022: question paper and mark scheme

Cambridge AS & A Level Biology (9700), Paper 5 Planning, Analysis and Evaluation, May/June 2022. Read both free below, or download them. Done the paper? Get it marked by AI against this mark scheme.

9700_s22_qp_519700_s22_ms_519700/51/M/J/22

Paper
Paper 5 Planning, Analysis and Evaluation
Total marks
30
Time
1 hour 15 minutes
Questions
2
Code on the paper
9700/51/M/J/22
9700_s22_ms_51.pdf

9700/51 mark scheme, question by question

Each question as it's printed, and the mark scheme's points for it, as text. Diagrams, tables and graphs are in the PDFs above.

Question 116 marks

Question

A group of students investigated two habitats: dense woodland and open grassland. • Trees are the dominant plants in woodland. The trees form a canopy under which flowering herbs, small shrubs and grasses grow. • Grasses are the dominant plants in grassland. The grasses and small flowering plants form a continuous ground cover with only a few small shrubs present. Fig. 1.1 shows photographs of the two areas. Fig. 1.1 The students decided to compare the adaptations for reducing water loss in the plants growing in each area. The students suggested the following hypothesis: The density of stomata will be higher in plants found in the woodland habitat than in the grassland habitat. (a) (i) State the independent and dependent variables in this investigation. independent variable …… dependent variable …… [2] The students collected leaves from a number of different plant species in each area. To study the density of stomata on leaves, impressions of the epidermis can be made using clear varnish. • One surface of each leaf is painted with a thin layer of varnish. • The varnish is left to dry. • Clear sticky tape is applied to the leaf over the varnished area, to make a leaf impression. • The tape and varnish are removed and stuck to a microscope slide. • The leaf impression on the slide is viewed using a microscope. Fig. 1.2 shows the microscope image of one leaf impression prepared in this way. stoma Fig. 1.2 (ii) State the measurements that the students need to make to determine the stomatal density in Fig. 1.2. …… [2] (iii) Calculate the stomatal density in Fig. 1.2. Space for working. stomatal density = …… mm–2 [2] (iv) Describe how the students could gather data to compare the stomatal density of plants growing in the woodland and the grassland habitat. Your method should be set out in a logical order and be detailed enough to allow another person to follow it. You should not repeat details of the method for making the leaf impressions. …… [6] Question 1 continues on page 6. (b) The students found a published investigation on the effect of light intensity on stomatal density in the species Lycopersicon esculentum. Two plants of Lycopersicon esculentum were selected. One was grown in high light intensity and the other was grown in low light intensity. The results are shown in Table 1.1. Table 1.1 leaf high light intensity low light intensity number number of stomata ×103 leaf area number of stomata ×103 leaf area / cm2 / cm2 upper lower upper lower surface surface surface surface 1 1634 3131 496 18 1277 160 2 1482 5072 509 10 906 115 3 1865 6365 637 14 1398 171 mean 1660 4856 547 14 1194 149 (i) Calculate the percentage decrease in mean leaf area for leaves grown in low light intensity compared with those grown in high light intensity. Your answer should be expressed as a whole number. …… % [1] (ii) The scientists who carried out the published investigation concluded that: plants grown in higher light intensity have higher stomatal density only on the upper surface of the leaves compared to plants grown in lower light intensity. Evaluate whether or not the data in Table 1.1 supports this conclusion. …… [3] [Total: 16]

Mark scheme

1(a)(i) independent variable: 2 (type of) habitat / described ; dependent variable: density / number / AW, of stomata ; 1(a)(ii) Radius / diameter (of field of view / image / circle / Fig 1.2) ; 2 number of stomata ; 1(a)(iii) 2 marks for density range: 2 0.014–0.019 ; ; if outside this range one mark for: stomatal number: 61 (full) – 69 (all) ; area: 4069 – 4301 ; 1(a)(iv) any six from: 6 1 ref. to method of, random / systematic sampling of plants ; 2 (take leaves) from same species, that is present in both habitats ; 3 collect a minimum of 5 leaf samples (in both habitats) ; 4 same position / age, of leaf (on plant) ; 5 impressions to be taken from, lower / upper / both / same, surface(s) (of leaves) ; 6 (impressions viewed using) same, magnification / lens / size of field of view ; 7 count stomata (in field of view) ; 8 details of systematic counting / count only whole stomata / take a photograph and mark ; 9 repeat, (same) experiment (both habitats) minimum of twice, and calculate a mean ; 10 safety: hazard and risk and mitigation ; 1(b)(i) 73 (%) ; 1 1(b)(ii) support – max 2 marks: 3 1 stomatal density on upper surface is higher in plants grown in high light intensity ora ; 2 difference in (mean) stomatal density on upper surface (between the two light intensities) is greater than the difference between the lower surfaces ora ; 3 stomatal density on lower surface is similar / very close ; 4 leaf 1 stomatal density on lower surface is less than in plants grown in low light intensity ora ; 5 calculate pair of stomatal densities (for 1 to 4) ; doesn’t support – max 2 marks: 6 mean stomatal density, on lower / both, surface(s) is higher in plants grown in high light intensity ora ; 7 for 2 out of 3 leaves / leaf 2 and 3, stomatal density is not higher only on the upper surface / is higher on lower / both, surface(s) ; 8 calculate pair of stomatal densities (for 6 / 7) ; ecf 9 no statistical analysis done ; 10 data only, for one species / L. esculentum ;

Question 214 marks

Question

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an example of a virus that spreads from other animals to humans where it causes disease. Fig. 2.1 shows a chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes troglodytes. Chimpanzees can carry the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) which is similar to HIV. It is thought that chimpanzees who carry antibodies for SIV do not become ill if infected with HIV. This has been investigated by scientists developing potential vaccines for HIV. Fig. 2.1 Tests were carried out to see if antibodies against SIV present in chimpanzees bind to HIV antigens. Test strips were prepared which contained several different HIV antigens. When samples are applied to the test strip a line will appear in the control region. If the sample contains antibodies to the HIV antigens present on the strip, additional lines will also appear. Samples of chimpanzee faeces were collected from a number of sites in Gabon in central Africa. The faecal samples were prepared and then applied to the test strips. (a) (i) Suggest why the investigators collected faecal samples from chimpanzees rather than plasma samples. …… [1] (ii) Suggest a method for preparing the faecal samples before applying them to the test strips. …… [2] (iii) The scientists collected 608 faecal samples from 224 individual chimpanzees. Suggest a laboratory method that could be used to identify whether two faecal samples belong to the same individual or not. …… [1] Samples from humans and chimpanzees were applied to the test strips. 1. Plasma samples from humans who are infected with HIV (HIV+) 2. Plasma samples from humans who are not infected with HIV (HIV–) 3. Faecal samples from chimpanzees who are infected with SIV (SIV+) 4. Faecal samples from chimpanzees who are not infected with SIV (SIV–) The results are shown in Fig. 2.2. human plasma chimpanzee sample faecal sample HIV+ HIV– SIV+ SIV– control region test region 1 2 3 4 Fig. 2.2 (b) Suggest conclusions that can be drawn from the results shown in Fig. 2.2. …… [3] Question 2 continues on page 12. (c) HIV infection may lead to HIV/AIDS which, if left untreated, may cause death. The effects of SIV infection in chimpanzees are usually less severe. A group of scientists investigated the effect of SIV infection on the life expectancy of a population of chimpanzees living in the wild. • The population of 94 chimpanzees was observed for a nine-year period. • The ages of all the chimpanzees in the population were estimated. • The chimpanzees were observed each day. • The numbers of dead and absent chimpanzees were recorded each day. • Faecal samples of all the chimpanzees in the population were tested for SIV antibodies. The results of the investigation are summarised in Table 2.1 and Fig. 2.3. Table 2.1 SIV status original number of number of chimpanzees who died or chimpanzees in population disappeared during the study SIV– 77 11 SIV+ 17 7 The percentage of chimpanzees of each age remaining in the population are represented in Fig. 2.3. 100 90 Key SIV+ 80 SIV– 70 60 percentage of each age surviving 50 after nine years 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 age of chimpanzees at start of the nine-year period / years Fig. 2.3 (i) Fig. 2.3 presents the results of the investigation as the percentage of chimpanzees surviving at each age. Explain the advantages of presenting the results of this study as percentages. …… [2] The investigators concluded that chimpanzees infected with SIV die at an earlier age than uninfected chimpanzees. The investigators decided to test their conclusion statistically. (ii) State a null hypothesis the scientists could make before carrying out their statistical test. …… [1] (iii) The investigators carried out their statistical analysis and found that they could reject the null hypothesis at p < 0.05. Explain what is meant by the term p < 0.05. …… [2] (iv) Suggest why the data presented in Fig. 2.3 may not be an accurate representation of the effect of SIV infection on the life expectancy of the chimpanzees. …… [2] [Total: 14] The boundaries and names shown, the designations used and the presentation of material on any maps contained in this question paper/insert do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by Cambridge Assessment International Education concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area or any of its authorities, or of the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

Mark scheme

2(a)(i) any one from: 1 (faecal samples) can be, collected remotely / AW, without harming the chimpanzees / investigators ; (faecal samples) are, non-invasive / less stressful for chimpanzees / limits human interaction / no risk of infection / no need to anesthetise chimpanzees ; 2(a)(ii) any two from: 2 make into a, suspension / solution / liquify faeces ; filtered / centrifuged (to remove solids) ; 2(a)(iii) idea of: 1 genetic profiling / DNA fingerprinting / DNA profiling / DNA sequencing / genetic analysis / (DNA) electrophoresis ; 2(b) any three from: 3 1 (some) SIV antibodies will bind to HIV antigens ; 2 details of, which / number of lines / bands, match / don’t match / AW ; 3 (some) SIV and HIV antibodies have similar (protein), structures / shape ; 4 HIV– people do not contain (HIV) antibodies / SIV– chimpanzees do not contain (SIV) antibodies ; 5 the tests are valid as there is a line in each of the control regions ; 2(c)(i) 1 allows for, valid / meaningful, comparison (between SIV+ and SIV– chimpanzees) ; 2 2 the groups have different, initial / original numbers ; 2(c)(ii) no difference between the, life expectancy / AW, of chimpanzees that are SIV+ and SIV– ; 1 2(c)(iii) mp1: 2 probability / it, is where null hypothesis is rejected ora ; or probability / it, is where critical values are chosen ; mp2: less than, 0.05 / 5% / 5 in 100, probability that the, result / it, is not significant / is due to chance ; or more than, 0.95 / 95% / 95 in 100, probability that the, result / it, is significant / is not due to chance ; 2(c)(iv) any two from: 2 idea that: 1 results, may not be due to death from SIV / may be due to disappearance ; 2 death could be due to, hunting / accident / fighting / predators / lack of food / disease (infectious or other) / AW ; 3 ages of chimps were estimated ; 4 uninfected chimpanzees may catch SIV during the investigation ; 5 no data on, male/female chimps (as life expectancy may differ) ;

Checked your answers against these? Let AI mark the whole paper, on your own working.

Mark my 9700/51

How this paper is marked

Examiners follow the generic marking principles at the front of the scheme, then each question's points: method (M), accuracy (A) and independent (B) marks, error carried forward where the scheme allows it, and positive marking, so you're credited for what you got right.

Check your answers against it

Done this paper? Upload your script and CIE Buddy's AI marker marks it question by question against this exact scheme, puts the ticks on your own working and says what each lost mark needed.

9700/51 in other series

Find another Biology paper

Every AS & A Level Biology mark scheme

Question papers and mark schemes © Cambridge University Press & Assessment. CIE Buddy is independent and not connected to Cambridge.

9700/51 questions

Where can I find the 9700/51 May/June 2022 mark scheme?

On this page, free: the mark scheme for AS & A Level Biology 9700/51, May/June 2022 (9700_s22_ms_51), and the question paper (9700_s22_qp_51), to read or download, with each question's marking points written out underneath.

How many marks is 9700/51 out of?

Biology 9700/51 for May/June 2022 is out of 30 marks, with 1 hour 15 minutes to answer it, across 2 questions.

Can I get my 9700/51 answers marked?

Yes. Upload your answers to 9700/51/M/J/22 as a PDF or photos, and CIE Buddy marks every question against this paper's official mark scheme, using Cambridge's marking rules. You get your score, each lost mark explained on your own script, and the topics to revise. It's a guide, not an official Cambridge grade.