Economics 9708/42 February/March 2024: question paper and mark scheme
Cambridge AS & A Level Economics (9708), Paper 4 A Level Data Response and Essays, February/March 2024. Read both free below, or download them. Done the paper? Get it marked by AI against this mark scheme.
French electricity prices
In 2022 the French government ordered a large electricity company, partly owned by the state, to sell more electricity at lower prices than its rivals. The company said this would have a negative impact on its profits and result in a decrease in the value of the company’s shares owned by the private sector.
Competitors in electricity supply in France are allowed to buy power from this company at a 40% discount due to its monopoly position. The government instructed the company to increase the amount they must sell to competitors at the discounted market price.
The government also cut taxes on electricity to try to keep the increase in prices for households and small businesses to 4%, rather than the expected 35%, without any government action.
As well as producing electricity in France, the company owns nuclear power stations and gas-fired power stations in the UK and supplies 11% of the UK’s electricity.
A global shortage of natural gas supplies caused a crisis, pushing up electricity prices. Much electricity is produced in gas-fired power plants. The situation was worsened by faults in the electricity-producing nuclear power plants in both the UK and France.
In January 2022 alone, a further five nuclear power plants in France were forced to close. That meant that 18 of the 56 plants had closed; a worrying proportion for a company that derives 70% of its electricity output from nuclear power. The plants were old. Corrosion caused safety fears and the closures restricted supplies.
Previously, the nuclear power plants put France in a strong self-sufficient position of which other
European countries can only dream. The UK, for example, has to import expensive gas to produce electricity, where the price rise was expected to be not 35%, as in France, but 56%. However, the cost to the French government of reducing the electricity price affected its ability to finance renewable energy projects as well as build a new generation of nuclear reactors.
The government claimed the benefit was that they rescued millions of households from the prospect of excessive rises in electricity prices.
Source: The Daily Telegraph, 15 January 2022
(a) Identify what caused the rise in the electricity prices and explain whether it can be concluded from the article that the price rise was an example of market failure. [5]
(b) Is there any evidence in the article that the French government’s decisions will increase competition or efficiency in the energy market? [4]
(c) (i) Distinguish between equality and equity. [3]
(ii) Consider whether the actions of the French government on electricity prices might be thought to increase either equality or equity for consumers and producers. [8]
Section B
Answer one question.
EITHER
Mark scheme
1(a) Identify what caused the rise in the electricity prices and explain 5
whether it can be concluded from the article that the price rise was an
example of market failure.
Natural gas supply shortage (1) breakdown of nuclear reactors (1).
Market failure occurs when price mechanism fails to account for all of the
costs and benefits necessary to determine price equilibrium and this results in
allocative inefficiency (accept alternative definitions of market failure) (2).
There is no evidence of allocative inefficiency and no market failure (accept
either) (1).
1(b) Is there any evidence in the article that the French government’s 4
decisions will increase competition or efficiency in the energy market?
Competitors got cheaper electricity, so this maybe increases competition (1).
Alternative renewable energy projects were stopped, so possibly leading to
less efficiency (1). Five reactors were forced to close due to poor
maintenance and becoming less efficient (1). The reactors enabled self -
sufficiency so this is now less likely.
Conclusion: some evidence of increasing competition, no evidence of
increasing efficiency (1). Accept fall in monopoly profits might lead to a fall in
dynamic efficiency (1).
4 marks maximum
1(c)(i) Distinguish between equality and equity. 3
Economic equality is the equal distribution of income, wealth in society (1)
plus (1) for further development.
Equity is fairness/justice particularly in regard to welfare economics (1) plus
(1) for further development.
3 marks maximum
1(c)(ii) Consider whether the actions of the French government on electricity 8
prices might be thought to increase either equality or equity for
consumers and producers.
Cannot show that changes in price are linked to any notion of fairness, in
relation to producer (1). Therefore, producer equity will be unaffected (1). A
tax cut might increase consumer equity (1).
Explanation (1) equality possibly, consumer rescued from excessive price
increase (1) but as both rich and poor consumer benefit it is not conclusive
that consumer equality is improved (1).
Small firms will get cheaper electricity at the expense of large firms and this
suggests an increase in equality between producers might be obtained (2).
However, a cut in electricity taxes might benefit the large electricity company
more than its smaller rivals, therefore any conclusion on the impact of equality
for producers might remain uncertain (2).
8 marks maximum
EITHER
With the help of a diagram, assess the effectiveness of a government’s intervention in the price mechanism to address the causes of climate change. [20]
OR
Mark scheme
2 With the help of a diagram, assess the effectiveness of a government ’s 20
intervention in the price mechanism to address the causes of climate
change.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
AO1 and AO2 out of 14 marks. AO3 out of 6 marks.
Indicative content
Responses may include:
AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis
• An explanation of the link between climate change and negative
externalities.
• Explanation of negative externalities
• Recognition that negative externalities can be caused by production or
consumption.
• Use of a diagram to show the links between climate change and negative
externalities
• Analysis of how market forces can be used to address the consequences
of climate change.
L2 maximum if no accurate diagram provided.
2 AO3 Evaluation
• The link between climate change on negative externalities is very difficult
to accurately establish
• It is also extremely difficult to measure negative externalities
• The use of taxation to influence price and output is unlikely to remove all
negative externalities because it is very difficult to measure the correct
amount of taxation that should be applied.
• The use of minimum prices to reduce negative externalities would only be
partially effective and might have significant effects on firm’s profits and
employment.
• Alternatives to the use of the price mechanism might, in some
circumstance, allow a government to achieve a more precise control of
negative externalities. For example, through the use of a complete ban of
consumption/production.
• A conclusion should be attempted which examines the net benefits of
each alternative i.e. through direct government intervention or through the
use of market forces.
Accept all valid responses.
AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis 14
AO3 Evaluation 6
OR
The introduction of a trade union into a perfectly competitive labour market will always lead to higher wage levels and a higher level of unemployment.
With the help of a diagram, evaluate this statement. [20]
Section C
Answer one question.
EITHER
Mark scheme
3 The introduction of a trade union into a perfectly competitive labour 20
market will always lead to higher wage levels and a higher level of
unemployment.
With the help of a diagram, evaluate this statement.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
AO1 and AO2 out of 14 marks. AO3 out of 6 marks.
Indicative content
Responses may include:
AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis
• Characteristics of a perfectly competitive labour market should be
described.
• The role and main aims of a trade union should be outlined, emphasising
the importance of their role in wage bargaining.
• A diagram should be provided which shows how wages are determined in
a perfectly competitive labour market and how this impacts upon the
wage and level of employment within each firm.
• Analysis should discuss alternative ways in which a trade union might
affect wages and employment. References might be made to factors
which affect both the supply of and demand for labour.
• Analysis should then be used to determine the extent to which the
intervention of a trade union can influence wage and employment levels
in a perfectly competitive labour market.
L2 maximum if no accurate diagram provided.
3 AO3 Evaluation
• In some cases, the introduction of trade unions might lead to an increase
in the productivity of the workforce through the provision of better training.
Although an increase in productivity might also be produced by
substituting capital for labour which might lead to an increase in
unemployment.
• Trade unions might gain higher wages for labour but because this makes
capital relatively cheaper, machines might be substituted for labour which
will further reduce employment.
• The impact of higher wages on employment will also depend upon how
easy it is to substitute capital for labour and the existing proportion of
capital to labour in the particular industry.
• If trade unions manage to bargain for higher wages but the new wage is
above the market equilibrium, there will be an excess supply of labour at
the new wage leading to higher unemployment. The extent of this impact
will be determined by the relative elasticities of supply of and demand for
labour
• A conclusion should attempt to address each element of the statement.
The key word ‘always’ should be considered in the light of the preceding
argument.
Accept all valid responses.
AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis 14
AO3 Evaluation 6
EITHER
With the help of a diagram, assess the effectiveness of government policies which might be used to reduce cost-push inflation. [20]
OR
Mark scheme
4 With the help of a diagram, assess the effectiveness of government 20
policies which might be used to reduce cost push inflation.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
AO1 and AO2 out of 14 marks. AO3 out of 6 marks.
Indicative content
AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis
• A clear outline of different causes inflation and why inflation might cause
problems.
• A more detailed explanation of the causes of cost push inflation,
supported by an accurately labelled diagram
• A description of alternative policies that a government might use to
reduce cost push inflation
• Analysis can be used to show how a government will be able to increase
aggregate supply, in the long term, by increasing productivity through
direct investment. For example, by increasing expenditure on
education/infrastructure. This analysis might also be supported by a
relevant diagram
• In the short term, a government might focus on attempting to reduce the
cost of producing goods and services by introducing widespread
subsidies, reducing indirect taxation, removing tariffs on key imports or
the use of incomes policies.
L2 maximum if no accurate diagram provided
Must refer to some supply side polices to gain L3 marks
4 AO3 Evaluation
• Increasing the use of subsidies and/or decreasing the use of indirect
taxation is likely to have a negative effect on a government’s budget. For
example, increasing the budget deficit and subsequently increasing the
need for more government borrowing.
• Removing tariffs is likely to have a negative effect on the incomes and
output of domestic producers and possibly lead to an increase in
unemployment
• The introduction of incomes policies is likely to lead to opposition from
trade Unions and the possibility of industrial disruption.
• Long run supply-side policies are likely to focus on attempts to increase
productivity. This frequently involves significant investment in new
technology which will lead to a rise in unemployment in the short run
• Other policies which might be used in the long run might include
immediate investment in skills training and improving the quality of the
infrastructure. Skills training is expensive and hence has a high initial
opportunity cost. While the immediate effect of an increase in expenditure
on improving the infrastructure is likely to increase aggregate demand
and add to the inflationary pressure
• A conclusion should attempt to assess the relative effectiveness of each
type of policy approach and consider which approach is likely to be the
most effective in the short run and then compare this with possible
outcomes that might be achieved in the long run.
Accept evaluation relating to demand side policies.
AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis 14
AO3 Evaluation 6
OR
Globalisation will help to achieve economic growth in high-income economies and this will automatically improve living standards.
Evaluate this statement. [20]
Mark scheme
5 Globalisation will help to achieve economic growth in high -income 20
economies and this will automatically improve living standards.
Evaluate this statement.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
AO1 and AO2 out of 14 marks. AO3 out of 6 marks.
Indicative content
Responses may include:
AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis
• Globalisation would promote free trade, free movement of capital and
labour and the transfer technology. Cultural and political ties would be
strengthened.
• Key characteristics of high-income countries would include: high levels of
productivity; high GDP per capita; significant dependence on producing
and exporting secondary/tertiary goods/services.
• High living standards are generally associated with: low poverty levels;
advanced infrastructure; good housing, education and health; and low
infant mortality rates.
• Economic growth is usually measured by changes in real GDP per capita
in a specific time period.
• An improvement in living standards is very closely linked with an
improvement in economic performance. An improvement in economic
performance is measured by increases in GDP per capita.
• Globalisation through trade and technology transfer should provide
opportunities to create more real wealth.
• Higher levels of tax revenue are likely to be received by a high-income
country’s government. This will enable more expenditure on health,
housing and education as well as increased access to more consumer
goods. These improvements are generally associated with a rise in the
standard of living.
5 AO3 Evaluation
• The links between an increase in economic growth and an increase in
living standards are not clear. Economic growth is a quantitative measure
not a qualitative measure
• Economic growth which depends upon globalisation would increase long
distance transport which would create more negative externalities.
• It is not clear how any benefits of economic growth might be used in a
high-income economy
• Globalisation might lead to an increase in cheap imports from low-income
economies which might lead to higher levels of unemployment in more
advanced economies.
• A conclusion might attempt to form an overall judgement on the short
term and long-term benefits of globalisation in relation to the improvement
of living standards in high-income countries. Also a judgement should
consider whether this will automatically improve living standards.
Accept all valid responses.
AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis 14
AO3 Evaluation 6
Checked your answers against these? Let AI mark the whole paper, on your own working.
Examiners follow the generic marking principles at the front of the scheme, then each question's points: method (M), accuracy (A) and independent (B) marks, error carried forward where the scheme allows it, and positive marking, so you're credited for what you got right.
Check your answers against it
Done this paper? Upload your script and CIE Buddy's AI marker marks it question by question against this exact scheme, puts the ticks on your own working and says what each lost mark needed.
Where can I find the 9708/42 February/March 2024 mark scheme?+
On this page, free: the mark scheme for AS & A Level Economics 9708/42, February/March 2024 (9708_m24_ms_42), and the question paper (9708_m24_qp_42), to read or download, with each question's marking points written out underneath.
How many marks is 9708/42 out of?+
Economics 9708/42 for February/March 2024 is out of 60 marks, with 2 hours to answer it.
Can I get my 9708/42 answers marked?+
Yes. Upload your answers to 9708/42/F/M/24 as a PDF or photos, and CIE Buddy marks every question against this paper's official mark scheme, using Cambridge's marking rules. You get your score, each lost mark explained on your own script, and the topics to revise. It's a guide, not an official Cambridge grade.