Question 130 marks
Question
A new capital for Zambia? Zambia is a middle-income country but one with 60% of its population of 15 million living below the poverty line. In 2017, the Zambian government announced that it was planning to move the country’s capital from Lusaka in the south of the country to Ngabwe, a village in the centre of the country. Ngabwe currently lacks good roads and other infrastructure. A move to Ngabwe, however, may help the country to cope with its high rate of population growth and encourage entrepreneurs to set up new businesses in that area. In 2017, the country had a zero net migration rate, a birth rate of 41.8, a death rate of 12.4, and a life expectancy of 52.5 years. Zambia’s economic growth rate averaged 6.8% between 2004 and 2014. This rate fell after 2014 due, in part, to a depreciation in the kwacha, Zambia’s currency. The reduction in the foreign exchange rate of the kwacha contributed to the rise in the country’s inflation rate from 10.1% in 2015 to 20.6% in 2016. In 2017, the labour force of 7.2 million accounted for 48% of the country’s population. Workers are employed in a range of industries including agriculture, banking, building, copper mining, and emerald mining. Fig. 1.1 shows the relationship between copper output and revenue from the sale of copper, the index for 2010 is 100. 140 130 120 110 index 100 90 80 70 60 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Copper output Revenue from the sale of copper Fig. 1.1 Copper output and revenue from the sale of copper 2010—17 (index numbers) In 2017, Zambia’s central bank reduced commercial bank lending. This lowered investment and household borrowing. Government spending rose more slowly and some cuts were made to the government’s spending on training. (a) Identify, from the extract, two primary sector industries. [2] (b) Calculate, using information from the extract, how many people in Zambia lived in poverty in 2017. [2] (c) Explain, using information from the extract, why Zambia had a high rate of population growth in 2017. [2] (d) Explain, using information from the extract, why a depreciation of the kwacha harmed the Zambian economy. [4] (e) Analyse, using Fig. 1.1, the relationship between copper output and revenue from the sale of copper. [5] (f) Discuss whether or not a central bank should reduce commercial bank lending. [5] (g) Explain, using information from the extract, two reasons why productivity may have been low in Zambia. [4] (h) Discuss whether or not building a new city will benefit an economy. [6] Section B Answer any three questions in this section.
Mark scheme
1(a) Identify, from the extract, two primary sector industries. 2 • agriculture • copper mining • emerald mining 1(b) Calculate, using information from the extract, how many people in Zambia lived in 2 poverty in 2017. • 9m (2). • Correct working: 15 m × 60% (1). 1(c) Explain, using information from the extract, why Zambia had a high rate of 2 population growth in 2017. • Birth rate exceed death rate / more people being born than dying (2). • High birth rate / high natural increase (1). • Birth rate 41.8 and death rate 12.4 (1). 1(d) Explain, using information from the extract, why a depreciation of the kwacha 4 harmed the Zambian economy. • Inflation rate rose (1) from 10.1% in 2015 to 20.6% in 2016 (1). • Growth rate fell (1) from 6.8% after 2014 (1). • Depreciation is a fall in the value of the currency (1) import prices would have been higher (1) increasing costs of production (1) leads to higher prices (1) demand for higher wages (1) creating a wage-price spiral (1). • Higher inflation may have reduced international competitiveness (1) reducing output / economic growth rate (1) leading to lower employment (1) and reduction in living standards (1). 1(e) Analyse, using Fig.1.1, the relationship between copper output and revenue from 5 A pattern of analysis is expected in the sale of copper. response to this type of question. Expected relationship - a direct relationship would have been expected / moved in Do not reward simple statements same direction / as copper output rose, revenue should have risen (1). (repetition) of the figures given in the table. Evidence in support of unexpected relationship • Does not support expected relationship / shows an inverse relationship (1). • Between 2010–14 revenue rose (from 100 to 128) but output fell (from 100 to 90) so prices rose (1). • Between 2014–17 revenue fell (from128 to 90) but output rose (from 90 to 108) which meant that prices fell (1). • In 2014 copper revenue was highest 128 and output at its lowest 90, while in 2017 copper revenue was at its lowest 90 and output at its highest 108, so changes in revenue were greater than changes in output of copper (1). Analysis of inverse relationship: • When output fell, price per unit may have risen more than fall in output, due to loss of economies of scale causing average costs to rise (1). • Price for Zambian copper affected by world market prices (1). • Copper is likely to be inelastic in demand so prices rise by more than fall in output increasing revenue (1). 1(f) Discuss whether or not a central bank should reduce commercial bank lending. 5 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS Up to 3 marks for why it should: (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) • Lowering consumer expenditure / investment by firms (1) may reduce demand-pull Each point may be credited only once, on inflation (1) making exports more competitive (1). either side of an argument, but separate • May prevent households and firms getting into debt (1) that they cannot repay development as to how/why the outcome banks (1) may avoid a financial crisis in the future (1). may differ is rewarded. • May reduce spending on imports (1) improve the current account position (1). Generic example mark Up to 3 marks for why it should not: Tax revenue may decrease 1 • It may reduce consumer expenditure (1) investment (1) this will lower total (aggregate) demand (1) which may reduce economic growth (1). ... because of reason e.g. 1 • Some firms may go out of business (1) causing unemployment (1) results in poverty incomes may be lower. (1). • Firms may not keep up with advances in technology (1) reduce international Tax revenue may increase 0 competitiveness (1) harm the current account position (1). because incomes may be higher • Households may not be able to borrow to pay for their everyday living / their i.e. reverse of a previous children’s education / their higher education (1) lower their career prospects (1). argument. Tax revenue may increase 1 because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1(g) Explain, using information from the extract, two reasons why productivity may 4 have been low in Zambia. • Low investment (1) e.g. fewer workers might be working with new advanced capital equipment (1). • Cut in the government spending on training (1) workers may be less skilled (1). • People living in poverty / poor health (1) more time off work (1). • Lack of infrastructure e.g. lack of roads / lack of school buildings (1) means greater difficulty getting to work / gaining adequate education (1). • Only 48% of the population work (1) less people in work (1). • Life expectancy of only 52.5 years (1) lack of skills / experience (1). 1(h) Discuss whether or not building a new city will benefit an economy. 6 Up to 4 marks for why it might: • Jobs will be created (1) reduce unemployment (1) higher total demand / economic growth (1) creating higher income / less poverty (1). • Better housing may be constructed (1) overcrowding may be reduced / less homelessness (1) living standards may rise (1). • MNCs may be attracted into the country (1) by improved facilities (1). • Results in higher tax revenue (1) which government can spend on other objectives e.g. education and health (1). Up to 4 marks for why it might not: • It will involve an opportunity cost (1) money spent/resources used could have been used to e.g. improve education and healthcare (1) may cause a budget deficit (1). • It may cause external costs (1) e.g. damage the environment (1). • People and firms may not want to move (1) new facilities will be wasted (1). • Causes inflation (1) if already at or close to full employment (1). • Pushes up prices (1) causing cost-push inflation (1). • Depletes natural resources / raw materials (1) more dependent on imports (1).