Economics 0455/23 October/November 2021: question paper and mark scheme
Cambridge IGCSE Economics (0455), Paper 2 Structured Questions, October/November 2021. Read both free below, or download them. Done the paper? Get it marked by AI against this mark scheme.
(a) Calculate the number of obese people in the UK in 2016. [1]
(b) Identify two reasons why the demand for vegan food has increased in the UK. [2]
(c) Explain one external benefit that may arise from eating less meat. [2]
(d) Explain how food consumption in Senegal differed from the US in 2015. [4]
(e) Analyse how an increase in labour mobility could improve the performance of a country’s trade in goods. [4]
(f) Analyse how an increase in meat consumption could benefit African economies. [5]
(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in Senegalese government spending will stop the country experiencing a recession. [6]
(h) Discuss whether or not emigration would reduce poverty in Senegal. [6]
Section B
Answer any three questions.
Each question is introduced by stimulus material. In your answers you may refer to the material and/or to other examples you have studied.
Mark scheme
1(a) Calculate the number of obese people in the UK in 2016. 1 Accept 18 million.
18.2 million/18 200 000/18.2 × 106
1(b) Identify two reasons why the demand for vegan food has 2 One mark each for each of two reasons.
increased in the UK.
Two from:
• (concerns about) health
• (concerns about) obesity
• (compassion for) animal welfare
• rise in income/getting richer/higher standard of living
• advertising of vegan products
• less consumption of meat
1(c) Explain one external benefit that may arise from eating 2 One mark for the external benefit identified and one mark
less meat. for the explanation.
Healthy/less obese people (1) are more productive/higher
output/live longer/government can spend more on education
and raise skills (1).
Improved environment/air/water quality (1) less greenhouse
gases/pollution/people sick (1).
1(d) Explain how food consumption in Senegal differed from 4 Accept a response from the viewpoint of the US e.g. US
the US in 2015. citizens ate more meat.
Senegalese citizens consumed fewer calories (1) consumed
less than the recommended amount/US consumed more than
the recommended amount (1).
Senegalese may have suffered malnourishment (1) US may
have suffered from obesity (1).
Senegalese had a healthier diet (1) e.g. more fruit and
vegetables (1).
A higher proportion of the Senegalese diet consisted of
cereals/grains (1) because it was cheap (1).
Senegalese citizens consumed less meat (1) because it was
expensive/low incomes (1).
Senegalese citizens consumed less sugar and/or sweeteners
(1).
Senegalese consumed a higher proportion of fruit and/or
vegetables (1).
Senegalese consumed less added fats and/or oils (1).
1(e) Analyse how an increase in labour mobility could 4
improve the performance of a country’s trade in goods.
Coherent analysis which might include:
Labour markets will become more efficient (1) workers
become more skilled (1) workers will move more easily
between industries/become more occupationally
mobile/respond quickly to changes in demand (1).
Workers can move more easily from one place to
another/become more geographically mobile (1).
If demand for a product rises (1) it will be easier to recruit new
workers/fill vacancies (1) more can be produced/supplied (1)
less need for imports (1) import expenditure could fall (1)
more can be exported (1) export revenue could rise (1).
1(f) Analyse how an increase in meat consumption could 5
benefit African economies.
Coherent analysis which might include:
May reduce malnutrition/make people healthier (1) make
workers more productive/efficient (1) improve quantity/quality
of output (1) lower costs of production (1) more competitive
internationally (1) exports increase/imports reduce (1)
economic growth (1).
Increase demand for vets and transport firms (1) increase
number of meat processing firms (1) greater investment by
firms (1) will increase output (1) raise employment (1) raise
incomes/standard of living (1).
Reduces government spending on health care (1) can spend
more on education/unemployment benefits/infrastructure
increasing skill levels/productivity (1).
1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in Senegalese 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command
government spending will stop the country experiencing word DISCUSS
a recession. (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d)
Award 1 mark for explanation of recession. Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an
argument, but separate development as to how/why the
Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons for why it might, outcome may differ is rewarded.
which might include:
Generic example Mar
• Government spending part of total (aggregate) demand k
(1) may increase total (aggregate) demand (1) may offset
fall in consumer expenditure (1) this may encourage Tax revenue may decrease 1
firms to produce more/attract new firms to set up (1)
employ more staff/lower (cyclical) unemployment (1) earn because of reason e.g. incomes may be 1
more income (1) purchase more goods and services (1). lower.
• Government spending on Tax revenue may increase because 0
education/training/healthcare infrastructure (1) improves incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a
productivity (1) make products more internationally previous argument.
competitive (1) increasing total (aggregate) demand (1)
raising output (1). Tax revenue may increase because of a 1
different reason i.e. not the reverse of a
• Government subsidies (1) will lower costs of production previous argument e.g. government
(1) encouraging firms to produce more (1). spending on subsidies may stimulate the
economy more than spending on education.
Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons for why it might not,
which might include:
• May not be great enough to offset fall in investment (1)
business confidence may be low (1). firms may not
increase output after being given government subsidies
(1)
1(g) • Consumer expenditure may fall (1) investment may not
rise (1) exports may fall (1)
• if consumer confidence is low (1).
• May be global recession (1) exports may fall (1).
• If taxes are raised to pay for the increase in government
spending (1) government borrows (1) effect on total
(aggregate) demand may be small (1).
Higher spending on education/health/infrastructure may not
result in increased workforce/greater productivity (1).
1(h) Discuss whether or not emigration would reduce poverty 6
in Senegal.
Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons for why it might,
which might include:
• Workers’ remittances may increase/emigrants may send
money home to Senegal (1) working abroad may enable
them to provide more financial support for their families
(1) than working at home (1) if wages are higher abroad
(1)
• Unemployment may fall (1) if potential emigrants could
not gain work at home (1)
• Increase ability of people to gain skills/work experience
(1) increasing their ability to earn more (1) can share
those skills with workers when they return to Senegal (1)
• Emigration may move the country towards the optimum
population (1) if the country lacks resources (1) this could
increase income per head (1) increasing ability to
purchase basic necessities (1)
Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons for why it might
not, which might include:
• Skilled workers may leave the country (1) reducing
output (1) discouraging MNCs (1) reducing jobs (1)
reducing income (1)
• There will be fewer people to pay taxes (1) lower tax
revenue available to spend to reduce poverty (1) e.g. on
education (1)
• May be more dependents on the government (1) if
parents leave children and elderly relatives behind (1)
• Fewer workers in the population (1) will make it harder to
finance state pensions (1) may reduce income of
pensioners (1)
In 2018, 54% of Russia’s population was female and the government announced plans to raise the state retirement age. In Russia, the role of the price mechanism to answer key resource allocation questions is increasing. However, the Russian government raised indirect taxes, partly to reduce market failure.
(a) Identify two reasons why a country may have more women than men in its population. [2]
(b) Explain two advantages of raising the retirement age. [4]
(c) Analyse how the price mechanism answers the three key resource allocation questions. [6]
(d) Discuss whether or not indirect taxation can reduce market failure. [8]
Mark scheme
2(a) Identify two reasons why a country may have more 2
women than men in its population.
Two from:
• women living longer
• more girls being born
• fewer female emigrants or male immigrants
• more female immigrants or male emigrants
• more men killed in wars
2(b) Explain two advantages of raising the retirement age. 4 One mark each for each of two advantages identified and
one mark each for each of two explanations.
Logical explanation which might include:
Reduction in pensions paid (1) money could be spent for
other purposes e.g. infrastructure (1).
Increase in size of the labour force/(1) increase in
output/productive potential/GDP/reduction in firms’ wage
costs (1).
Reduction in size of dependency ratio (1) less burden on
working population (1).
Rise in tax revenue/improve budget position (1) government
can spend more on e.g. public sector wages (1).
May increase health of the old (1) work may be mentally
challenging (1).
People can work longer (1) and earn more income/enjoy
higher living standards (1).
Older people have greater skills/more years of training (1)
can raise productivity/pass on skills to younger workers (1).
2(c) Analyse how the price mechanism answers the three key 6
resource allocation questions.
Coherent analysis which might include:
Definition of price mechanism e.g. where forces of demand
and supply determine the prices of goods and services (1) in
a market economy (1).
What to produce (1) the price mechanism acts a signal/the
price mechanism acts as an incentive on what to produce (1)
rations goods and services (1) price will rise for products in
higher demand (1) encouraging more to be made (1).
How to produce (1) e.g. more labour-intensive/more capital-
intensive methods of production will be used (1) if wages
fall/if cost of capital goods fall (1).
Who to produce for (1) those whose services are most in
demand will have the highest income (1) will be able to buy
the most (1)
2(d) Discuss whether or not indirect taxation can reduce 8
market failure. Level Description Marks
In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. 3 A reasoned discussion which 6–8
accurately examines both sides of
Why it might: the economic argument, making
use of economic information and
• demerit goods are overconsumed and cause external clear and logical analysis to
costs evaluate economic issues and
• demerit goods and other products causing external costs situations. One side of the
can be taxed argument may have more depth
• indirect taxation on demerit goods can discourage their than the other, but overall, both
consumption sides of the argument are
• merit goods are under-consumed and create external considered and developed. There
benefits is thoughtful evaluation of
• indirect tax revenue can be used to subsidise or produce economic concepts, terminology,
merit goods information and/or data appropriate
• public goods would not be produced by the private sector to the question. The discussion
as they have the characteristics of non-rival and non- may also point out the possible
excludable uncertainties of alternative
• indirect tax revenue can be used to finance the decisions and outcomes.
production of public goods
2 A reasoned discussion which 3–5
Why it might not: makes use of economic information
and clear analysis to evaluate
• difficult to measure external costs economic issues and situations.
The answer may lack some depth
• demerit goods may be overtaxed, changing from being
and development may be one-
overconsumed to being under-consumed
sided. There is relevant use of
• demand for some demerit goods is price inelastic
economic concepts, terminology,
• indirect taxes may fall more heavily on the poor
information and data appropriate to
• demand may just shift to imports if other countries do not the question.
impose indirect tax or have lower tax rates
• tax revenue may not be used to promote the
consumption of merit and public goods
2(d)
Level Description Marks
1 There is a simple attempt at u sing 1–2
economic definitions and
terminology. Some reference may
be made to economic theory, with
occasional understanding.
0 A mark of zero should be awarded 0
for no creditable content.
South Africa has a high number of unemployed workers. South Africa’s inflation rate has been stable in recent years, partly due to relatively stable wages. An increase in wages can cause inflation and can increase the number of consumer goods bought and produced. To increase employment and reduce the deficit on the current account of South Africa’s balance of payments, some economists suggest more foreign multinational companies (MNCs) should be encouraged to produce in South Africa.
(a) Identify two ways unemployment is measured. [2]
(b) Explain two ways an increase in wages can cause inflation. [4]
(c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC), the opportunity cost to an economy of producing more consumer goods. [6]
(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in foreign MNCs will reduce a deficit on the current account of the balance of payments of a host country. [8]
Mark scheme
3(a) Identify two ways unemployment is measured. 2
• claimant count/claiming benefits
• labour force survey/ILO measure/without a job and
seeking work
• formula for the unemployment rate/number of
unemployed divided by labour force × 100/through the
unemployment rate
• total labour force minus those currently employed
3(b) Explain two ways an increase in wages can cause 4 One mark each for each of two ways identified and one
inflation. mark each for each of two explanations.
Logical explanation which might include: Allow 1 mark if refer to prices rise but no mention of
Increase in wages may increase total (aggregate) demand-pull or cost-push inflation
demand/consumption (1) causing demand-pull inflation (1).
Increase in wages may increase costs of production (1)
causing cost-push inflation (1).
3(c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC), the 6
opportunity cost to an economy of producing more
consumer goods.
Up to 4 marks for the diagram:
Axes correctly labelled with capital/consumer goods (1).
Curve drawn as a curve/line sloping downward to the axes
(1).
Movement along the curve/along the axes (1).
Reduction in capital goods/increase in consumer goods
shown by numbers or letters or arrows (1).
Up to 2 marks for coherent analysis which might include:
Opportunity cost is the (next) best alternative forgone (1)
resources used to produce consumer goods cannot be used
to produce capital goods (1).
Producing more consumer goods now may mean fewer
consumer goods in the future (1) as there may be fewer
capital goods to make them (1).
3(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in foreign MNCs will 8 For level 3, an answer must look at both sides of
reduce a deficit on the current account of the balance of whether a deficit on the current account would be
payments of a host country. reduced.
In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Level Description Marks
Why it might: 3 A reasoned discussion which 6–8
accurately examines both sides of
• MNCs tend to export a relatively high proportion of their the economic argument, making
output use of economic information and
• may produce at a low cost of production/be efficient clear and logical analysis to
• may be internationally competitive evaluate economic issues and
• may produce products that were previously imported situations. One side of the
• may bring in new technology argument may have more depth
than the other, but overall, both
Why it might not: sides of the argument are
considered and developed. There
• may buy raw materials and capital goods from their home is thoughtful evaluation of
countries economic concepts, terminology,
• MNC may send profits back to home country information and/or data appropriate
• workers/managers may send remittances back to home to the question. The discussion
country may also point out the possible
• may eliminate firms in the host country that had a good uncertainties of alternative
export record decisions and outcomes.
• may deplete non-renewable resources reducing the
2 A reasoned discussion which 3–5
ability to export in the long run
makes use of economic information
and clear analysis to evaluate
economic issues and situations.
The answer may lack some depth
and development may be one-
sided. There is relevant use of
economic concepts, terminology,
information and data appropriate to
the question.
3(d)
Level Description Marks
1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2
economic definitions and
terminology. Some reference may
be made to economic theory, with
occasional understanding.
0 A mark of zero should be awarded 0
for no creditable content.
Norway has engaged in free trade to a greater extent in recent years. The country operates a floating foreign exchange rate. There has been a change in the pattern of employment in Norway.
For example, more Norwegians now work in jobs requiring a university degree. Some of these graduates work as economists and lawyers dealing with mergers between firms. In 2017, there were 332 mergers, an increase of 23% on the previous year.
(a) Identify two benefits of free trade. [2]
(b) Explain two differences between a floating foreign exchange rate and a fixed foreign exchange rate. [4]
(c) Analyse how a change in the pattern of employment in a country may change its average wage. [6]
(d) Discuss whether or not a government should stop firms merging. [8]
Mark scheme
4(a) Identify two benefits of free trade. 2
Two from:
• higher output/growth
• higher income/living standards
• more employment/more jobs
• more choice/access to other markets
• lower price
• greater ability to take advantage of economies of
scale/greater efficiency/specialisation
• drives competition
• better quality goods
• stronger global co-operation
4(b) Explain two differences between a floating foreign 4 One mark each for each of two differences identified and
exchange rate and a fixed foreign exchange rate. one mark each for each of two explanations.
Logical explanation which might include:
A floating exchange rate is determined by market forces (1) a
fixed exchange rate is set by the government/central bank
(1).
A floating exchange rate can change on a day-to-day basis
(1) whereas a fixed exchange does not often change in value
(1).
A rise in the value of floating exchange rate is an appreciation
/ a fall in the value of a floating exchange rate is a
depreciation (1) a rise in the value of a fixed exchange rate is
a revaluation/a fall in value of a fixed exchange rate is a
devaluation (1).
A floating exchange rate does not require a central bank to
buy and sell the currency (1) a fixed exchange rate needs
reserves of foreign currency to maintain it (1).
4(c) Analyse how a change in the pattern of employment in a 6 Allow up to 3 marks for why wages may change due to
country may change its average wage. changes in demand and supply with reference to a
particular industry.
Coherent analysis which might include:
Note: answers must address a change in pattern of
A higher proportion of skilled workers (1) due to better employment
education/training (1) will raise the average wage/skilled
workers tend to be highly paid (1).
An increase in proportion of workers in the tertiary
sector/smaller proportion of workers in the primary sector (1)
example of industry/as economy develops there tends to be
more workers in the tertiary sector/fewer in the primary sector
(1) will tend to increase the average wage (1).
A greater proportion of women workers (1) change in social
attitudes/anti-discrimination legislation (1) may increase the
average wage (1).
A higher proportion of workers in the public sector (1) may be
better training / may be more fringe benefits/may be more job
security (1) may increase/reduce the average wage (1).
A larger proportion of workers in the formal economy (1) more
likely to be represented by a trade union/will have legal rights
(1) may increase the average wage.
Age (1) older workers may be more experienced/in promoted
posts (1) may be better paid (1).
4(d) Discuss whether or not a government should stop firms 8
merging. Level Description Marks
In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. 3 A reasoned discussion which 6–8
accurately examines both sides of
Why it should: the economic argument, making
use of economic information and
• will have greater market share clear and logical analysis to
• may abuse greater market power evaluate economic issues and
• may become complacent situations. One side of the
• consumers may experience higher prices and lower argument may have more depth
quality than the other, but overall, both
• may engage in rationalisation sides of the argument are
• may increase unemployment considered and developed. There
• may experience diseconomies of scale is thoughtful evaluation of
economic concepts, terminology,
Why it should not: information and/or data appropriate
to the question. The discussion
• may innovate more may also point out the possible
• may provide consumers with lower prices and higher uncertainties of alternative
quality decisions and outcomes.
• may be more international competitive
2 A reasoned discussion which 3–5
• may improve current account position
makes use of economic information
• may increase economic growth and clear analysis to evaluate
• may experience economies of scale economic issues and situations.
The answer may lack some depth
and development may be one-
sided. There is relevant use of
economic concepts, terminology,
information and data appropriate to
the question.
4(d)
Level Description Marks
1 There is a simple attempt at u sing 1–2
economic definitions and
terminology. Some reference may
be made to economic theory, with
occasional understanding.
0 A mark of zero should be awarded 0
for no creditable content.
Industries and markets are changing in Vietnam. There is greater use of division of labour in a range of industries. Many markets are becoming more competitive, causing some firms to make losses. Manufacturing was Vietnam’s strongest sector in 2018, when manufacturing output increased by 13%.
(a) Define division of labour. [2]
(b) Explain two reasons why a loss-making firm may continue to produce. [4]
(c) Analyse the advantages that consumers may gain from a competitive market. [6]
(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in a country’s manufacturing output will increase its economic development. [8]
Mark scheme
5(a) Define division of labour. 2
Workers specialising (1) in particular tasks / repeating the
same task (1).
Breaking down production into different / separate tasks (1)
using different workers for the different tasks (1).
5(b) Explain two reasons why a loss-making firm may 4 One mark each for each of two reasons identified and one
continue to produce. mark each for each of two explanations.
Logical explanation which might include: Reward but do not expect reference to predatory pricing.
May not expect the loss to last (1) may think demand will
rise/costs will fall in the future (1).
May be subsidised by the government (1) to e.g. promote
social welfare/encourage consumption of merit
goods/increase exports/respond to dumping by other
countries (1).
May lower prices to drive out competitors/increase market
share (1) raising price when successful (1).
May accept losses in short-term (1) in order to expand in
long-term (1)
May have high retained profits (1) to allow for downturns in
demand/cover the losses (1).
May be a new firm (1) in the process of growth/trying to
survive (1).
A firm’s main objective may not be profit maximisation (1) e.g.
growing market share/charity/provides public goods (1).
5(c) Analyse the advantages that consumers may gain from a 6
competitive market.
Coherent analysis which might include:
Wide choice of producers (1) producing a similar product (1).
Efficiency (1) better quality (1) greater choice of products (1)
firms may innovate (1) as firms try to gain a larger share of
the market (1).
Lower price (1) as firms try to beat competition (1) increasing
consumers’ purchasing power/standard of living (1).
Raise consumer sovereignty (1) firms may respond quickly to
changes in consumer demand (1).
5(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in a country’s 8
manufacturing output will increase its economic Level Description Marks
development.
3 A reasoned discussion which 6–8
accurately examines both sides of
In assessing each answer, use the table opposite.
the economic argument, making
use of economic information and
Why it might:
clear and logical analysis to
evaluate economic issues and
• increase products available for households
situations. One side of the
• increase capital goods enabling greater capacity argument may have more depth
• may raise incomes/profits than the other, but overall, both
• create employment sides of the argument are
• may promote growth of the other two sectors – greater considered and developed. There
demand for raw materials and greater demand for is thoughtful evaluation of
services e.g. insurance economic concepts, terminology,
• may mean firms are getting larger – economies of scale, information and/or data appropriate
reduced average costs, increased exports to the question. The discussion
• likely to have a higher value added than primary sector may also point out the possible
• greater stability in income than primary sector uncertainties of alternative
decisions and outcomes.
Why it might not:
2 A reasoned discussion which 3–5
• may create pollution/reduce open spaces makes use of economic information
• jobs may have poor working conditions and clear analysis to evaluate
• employment may not rise if capital-intensive methods are economic issues and situations.
used The answer may lack some depth
• opportunity cost/less resources used in primary and/or and development may be one-
tertiary sectors sided. There is relevant use of
• wages may be lower than tertiary sector economic concepts, terminology,
• may reduce natural resources available for future information and data appropriate to
the question.
• goods produced may be of poor quality/inefficiently
produced/uncompetitive
5(d)
Level Description Marks
1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2
economic definitions and
terminology. Some reference may
be made to economic theory, with
occasional understanding.
0 A mark of zero should be awarded 0
for no creditable content.
Checked your answers against these? Let AI mark the whole paper, on your own working.
Examiners follow the generic marking principles at the front of the scheme, then each question's points: method (M), accuracy (A) and independent (B) marks, error carried forward where the scheme allows it, and positive marking, so you're credited for what you got right.
Check your answers against it
Done this paper? Upload your script and CIE Buddy's AI marker marks it question by question against this exact scheme, puts the ticks on your own working and says what each lost mark needed.
Where can I find the 0455/23 October/November 2021 mark scheme?+
On this page, free: the mark scheme for IGCSE Economics 0455/23, October/November 2021 (0455_w21_ms_23), and the question paper (0455_w21_qp_23), to read or download, with each question's marking points written out underneath.
How many marks is 0455/23 out of?+
Economics 0455/23 for October/November 2021 is out of 90 marks, with 2 hours 15 minutes to answer it.
Can I get my 0455/23 answers marked?+
Yes. Upload your answers to 0455/23/O/N/21 as a PDF or photos, and CIE Buddy marks every question against this paper's official mark scheme, using Cambridge's marking rules. You get your score, each lost mark explained on your own script, and the topics to revise. It's a guide, not an official Cambridge grade.