Biology 9700/52 May/June 2020: question paper and mark scheme
Cambridge AS & A Level Biology (9700), Paper 5 Planning, Analysis and Evaluation, May/June 2020. Read both free below, or download them. Done the paper? Get it marked by AI against this mark scheme.
(a) Woodlice are small invertebrates that live in cool, damp places under wood and stones.
Some students determined the respiration rate of woodlice at different temperatures.
Fig. 1.1 shows a single woodlouse.
length 5–25 mm
Fig. 1.1
The students tested the hypothesis:
For each 10 °C increase in temperature the volume of oxygen absorbed will double.
Fig. 1.2 shows the respirometer that the students used.
1 cm3 syringe
tap
scale
woodlice
gauze
carbon dioxide absorbent capillary tubing containing coloured liquid
Fig. 1.2
(i) State the independent variable and the dependent variable in this investigation.
independent variable ……
dependent variable ……
[2]
(ii) The students decided to measure oxygen uptake for 5 minutes using a range of temperatures from 5 °C to 35 °C.
Suggest why the students chose this range of temperatures and suggest a suitable interval that the students should use.
…… [2]
(iii) State a suitable control for this investigation.
…… [1]
(iv) State why the carbon dioxide absorbent solution was placed in the tube.
…… [1]
(v) Suggest one variable in this investigation that cannot be standardised.
…… [1]
(b) (i) Describe a method by which the students could set up the respirometer and use it to test their hypothesis:
For each 10 °C increase in temperature the volume of oxygen absorbed will double.
Your method should be set out in a logical order and be detailed enough to let another person follow it.
…… [7]
(ii) Each 1 cm length of the capillary tubing containing coloured liquid in Fig. 1.2 has a volume of 10 mm3.
Describe how the students could use their results to calculate the rate of respiration for each temperature from their results.
…… [3]
(iii) Use the axes in Fig. 1.3 to show the expected shape of the curve if the hypothesis is correct.
For each 10 °C increase in temperature the volume of oxygen absorbed will double.
Include the labels and units for each axis.
Fig. 1.3
[3]
(c) The students used the same apparatus to determine the output of carbon dioxide by the woodlice at 35 °C. The students used this result and the result for oxygen uptake at 35 °C to calculate the respiratory quotient (RQ).
The RQ was calculated as 0.95.
State what conclusion can be made from this RQ value.
…… [1]
[Total: 21]
Mark scheme
1(a)(i) independent variable: temperature ; 2
dependent variable: distance travelled by liquid / volume of oxygen taken up ;
1(a)(ii) 1 (because) these are temperatures at which, enzymes are expected to be functioning / woodlice may survive ; 1
2 (intervals of) 5 °C / 3 °C / 2 °C ;
1(a)(iii) inert material / glass beads, of same volume (as woodlice) ; A dead (sterilised) woodlice 1
1(a)(iv) idea that absorption of carbon dioxide allows measurement of uptake in oxygen / AW ; 1
1(a)(v) any 1 from: 1
1 movement of woodlice ;
2 size / age / sex, of woodlice ;
3 AVP ;
1(b)(i) allow in context of using the same respirometer for each temperature, or separate respirometers set up in the same way for 7
each temperature
any 7 of:
1 idea of adding a fixed volume of carbon dioxide absorbent solution ;
2 idea of adding fixed, number / mass, of woodlice to tube ;
3 idea of method of adding dye solution to capillary tube ;
4 idea of attaching tubes and making airtight ;
5 idea of placing respirometer tube into a water-bath at a stated temperature ;
6 idea of leaving apparatus to equilibrate with tap open ;
7 idea of closing the tap and, marking / recording, position of liquid ;
8 idea of measuring movement of dye on the scale for, 5 minutes / a set time ;
9 idea of re-opening tap / using syringe, to allow liquid to equalise and then closing to take another measurement ;
10 idea of a minimum of three measurements (in sequence) and taking a mean ;
11 idea of repeating experiment at each temperature, e.g. 5 °C, 10 °C, 15 °C, etc ;
12 low risk experiment
or
medium risk experiment due to (named) carbon dioxide absorbent is harmful and wear gloves ;
13 AVP ;
1(b)(ii) 1 idea of converting the distance in cm to mm3 by multiplying by 10 ; 3
2 volume calculated = volume of oxygen absorbed by woodlice ;
3 divide each of the volumes by time (oxygen uptake per unit time = rate of respiration) ;
1(b)(iii) 1 axes correctly orientated with labels ; 3
2 axes have units ;
3 line shows (exponential) increase as temperature increases ;
e.g.
volume of oxygen
absorbed
/ mm3 per unit time
temperature / °C
1(c) woodlice are using mostly carbohydrate as their energy source ; 1
A using a mixed energy source
A using, protein / lipid, under anaerobic conditions
R using, protein / fat only
(a) Cotton bollworms, Helicoverpa spp., are insect pests of cotton.
Adult cotton bollworms are moths. The adult female moths lay eggs on cotton plants. The eggs hatch into larvae. The larvae feed on cotton plants, causing extensive damage and reduction in yield.
Fig. 2.1 shows a mature cotton fruit (cotton boll) from an uninfested plant.
Fig. 2.2 shows a cotton bollworm larva inside a damaged cotton boll.
Fig. 2.1 Fig. 2.2
A gene, cry1Ac, from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), can be inserted into the cotton genome to produce Bt cotton.
• The protein, Cry1Ac, coded by cry1Ac is toxic to some species of bollworm.
• This toxicity gives cotton plants some resistance to cotton bollworm.
Studies of the effectiveness of the protein Cry1Ac showed that older plants produced less of the protein. As a result, spraying with insecticide was still needed when larval density increased.
An improved Bt cotton with two genes, cry1Ac and cry2Ab, produced two different proteins and was expected to give protection from Helicoverpa spp. for the whole growing season.
This improved Bt cotton was introduced into Australia in 2004. An investigation was carried out to determine whether this improved Bt cotton would also need spraying with insecticide.
Two different farms were used. In each farm, a standard-sized plot at the centre of a cotton field was marked out.
• Each plot measured 20 m2.
• Each plot was divided into 3 sets of 8 rows of cotton.
• Each row of cotton was divided into 1 metre sections, each with 8–10 plants.
Two treatments were used in each plot in a random pattern.
• In treatment 1, the researchers removed all the larvae from the plants.
• In treatment 2, the researchers made sure that there were 3 medium-sized larvae
(9–16 mm in length) per metre section.
Fig. 2.3 shows the arrangement of a 20 m2 plot in a cotton field.
20 m
one set of eight rows of Bt cotton
one row of Bt cotton divided into 1 m
20 m sections
one metre section of Bt cotton with
8–10 plants
key treatment 1 all larvae removed treatment 2
3 medium larvae per metre
Fig. 2.3
• After three days, the plot on one farm was sprayed with an insecticide and the plot on the other farm was not sprayed with an insecticide.
• The cotton bolls were picked at the same time, when all the bolls in each plot were open.
• The cotton bolls were weighed.
• The cotton fibres were separated from the cotton bolls and weighed.
(i) Suggest how the researchers made sure that there were 3 medium-sized larvae in each section for treatment 2.
…… [2]
(ii) Identify two variables that have been standardised in this investigation.
1 ……
2 ……
[2]
(iii) Explain why one of the plots was not sprayed with insecticide.
…… [1]
(b) Table 2.1 shows the results of this study.
Table 2.1
plot not sprayed with insecticide sprayed with insecticide
1 2 1 2 treatment (larvae (3 larvae (larvae (3 larvae removed) present) removed) present) mean mass of cotton bolls per section 521.2 ± 77.6 418.6 ± 74.2 615.5 ± 92.5 605.6 ± 118.1
/g ± s mean mass of cotton fibre per section 223.8 ± 30.9 203.7 ± 23.5 251.3 ± 38.6 240.0 ± 56.0
/g ± s
A t-test can be used to find out if treatment 2 has any effect on the yield of cotton fibre.
(i) State one reason why the t-test is suitable for the data in Table 2.1.
…… [1]
(ii) State a null hypothesis for the t-test to compare the effect of insecticide on yield of cotton fibre when larvae are present.
…… [1]
(c) The researchers were trying to find out if farmers growing improved Bt cotton will benefit from spraying the improved Bt cotton with insecticide to control cotton bollworm infestations.
Comment on whether the results in Table 2.1 show that improved Bt cotton should be sprayed with insecticide.
…… [2]
[Total: 9]
Mark scheme
2(a)(i) any 2 from: 2
1 remove all / add, larvae ;
2 measure larvae and select, medium-sized / 9–16 mm, larvae;
3 ref. to way of measuring ;
4 suitable equipment for handling larvae, e.g. paint brush, pooter, (blunt) forceps ;
5 place larvae on plants, randomly / on cotton bolls / on buds / AW ;
6 idea of breeding cotton bollworms to use for treatment 2 ;
7 AVP ;
2(a)(ii) any 2 from: 2
1 variety / type, of (Bt) cotton ;
2 number of rows of cotton ;
3 (1 m) length of cotton sections per test ;
4 number of plants in each section ;
5 (20 m2) size of the plot ;
6 size of larvae ;
7 density of larvae in each treatment ;
8 time before spraying with insecticide ;
9 cotton bolls picked at same time when all bolls in each plot were open / AW ;
2(a)(iii) (as a control) to compare the, quantity / mass / weight / yield, of cotton (fibres, and /or, seeds) from plots that were not 1
sprayed with insecticide with that from the plots that were sprayed / AW ;
2(b)(i) any 1 from: 1
1 compares the means of two sets of data ;
2 the data is continuous ;
3 the populations have a normal distribution ;
4 standard deviations are similar ;
2(b)(ii) there is no (significant) difference in the mass of cotton fibre produced when sprayed with insecticide or when not sprayed 1
with insecticide ;
2(c) any 2 from: 2
1 (mean) yield of cotton bolls increases when sprayed with insecticide ;
2 (mean) yield of cotton fibre increases, less / little / unchanged / AW, when sprayed ;
3 spraying makes little difference to the (mean) yields of bolls and fibres between treatments 1 and 2 ;
4 standard deviations appear large (e.g. for bolls sprayed in treatment 1 and 2) ;
5 mean ± SD overlap so no conclusion can be made ;
6 no results given for, t-tests / statistical tests ;
7 AVP ;
Checked your answers against these? Let AI mark the whole paper, on your own working.
Examiners follow the generic marking principles at the front of the scheme, then each question's points: method (M), accuracy (A) and independent (B) marks, error carried forward where the scheme allows it, and positive marking, so you're credited for what you got right.
Check your answers against it
Done this paper? Upload your script and CIE Buddy's AI marker marks it question by question against this exact scheme, puts the ticks on your own working and says what each lost mark needed.
Where can I find the 9700/52 May/June 2020 mark scheme?+
On this page, free: the mark scheme for AS & A Level Biology 9700/52, May/June 2020 (9700_s20_ms_52), and the question paper (9700_s20_qp_52), to read or download, with each question's marking points written out underneath.
How many marks is 9700/52 out of?+
Biology 9700/52 for May/June 2020 is out of 30 marks, with 1 hour 15 minutes to answer it, across 2 questions.
Can I get my 9700/52 answers marked?+
Yes. Upload your answers to 9700/52/M/J/20 as a PDF or photos, and CIE Buddy marks every question against this paper's official mark scheme, using Cambridge's marking rules. You get your score, each lost mark explained on your own script, and the topics to revise. It's a guide, not an official Cambridge grade.