Biology 9700/52 October/November 2020: question paper and mark scheme

Question

Some students observed a flowering plant and noticed that the flower was supported by a long stalk. To investigate how the stalk supported the flower, the students first cut transverse sections of the stalk. The students then used a light microscope to observe the transverse sections of the stalk. Fig. 1.1 shows a plan diagram of a transverse section of the stalk. thick waxy cuticle thin-walled pith cells vascular tissue in cortex epidermis hollow centre Fig. 1.1 Fig. 1.2 shows the appearance of two cells from each of the layers. epidermis with cortex pith thick waxy cuticle Fig. 1.2 The students cut out a piece of stalk that was 40 mm long and then split this lengthways into 4 strips, as shown in Fig. 1.3. epidermis cut positions cortex and pith 40 mm piece of stalk complete stalk one strip of stalk Fig. 1.3 The students observed that the strips immediately curved lengthways so that the epidermis was on the inside of the curve. All the strips were put into a Petri dish containing water and left for a period of time. After soaking in water, the strips curved even further. Fig. 1.4 shows the appearance of a strip after being soaked in water, viewed from one end. epidermis cortex and pith cells Fig. 1.4 (a) State what conclusions can be made about the role of the stalk cells in supporting the flower. …… [2] (b) In another investigation to find the water potential of the tissues in the flower stalk the students decided to: • put strips in different concentrations of sucrose solution • observe the direction and degree of curvature of the strips • calculate the angle of curvature of the strips from photographs, using a mathematical procedure that they found on the internet. The students were provided with a 1.0 mol dm−3 sucrose solution. They decided to use this to make a range of sucrose solutions. They made 50 cm3 of each solution. (i) Suggest a suitable range of solutions the students should use and describe how these solutions could be made by proportional dilution of the 1.0 mol dm−3 sucrose solution. …… [3] (ii) State the independent variable and the dependent variable in this investigation. independent variable …… dependent variable …… [2] (iii) Using the different sucrose solutions from (b)(i), describe a method the students could use to collect the data needed to estimate the water potential of the tissues in the flower stalk. Do not include details of how to make the sucrose solutions. Your method should be set out in a logical order and be detailed enough to let another person follow it. …… [7] (c) Fig. 1.5 shows the appearance of some strips of flower stalk after being immersed in high concentrations of sucrose solution and in low concentrations of sucrose solution. The students measured the curvature of the epidermis of the strips. epidermis epidermis very high sucrose high sucrose low sucrose very low sucrose concentration concentration concentration concentration Fig. 1.5 (i) Sketch a graph on Fig. 1.6 of the expected results of immersing strips of the flower stalks in sucrose solutions of different concentration. Include axes labels and units. Indicate how this graph could be used to estimate the sucrose concentration equivalent to the water potential of the tissues in the flower stalk. [4] Fig. 1.6 (ii) Predict the appearance of the strip in a sucrose solution that has the same water potential as the cells of the strip. …… [1] [Total: 19]

Question

Water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes, is a plant that grows on the surface of waterways such as rivers and lakes and is an alien species in many parts of the world. The plant grows and reproduces to form dense mats. As a result, water hyacinth outcompetes local species and reduces biodiversity. Weevils are a group of insects that feed on water hyacinth. Certain species of weevil are used in South Africa as part of a programme to control the spread of water hyacinth. Researchers carried out a two-stage investigation to assess the effect of weevils on water hyacinth. Stage 1 was a pilot experiment in the laboratory. Stage 2 was a field experiment. Stage 1: Pilot experiment • Water hyacinth plants were collected from the river and kept in a laboratory. • Each plant was kept in a separate bucket of river water for 6 weeks. • During the 6 weeks, the plants were inspected twice a day and any insects, including weevils, were removed. • Feeding scars (damage caused by insect feeding) were counted. • At the end of the 6 weeks, the buckets containing the plants were divided into 6 groups. • The length of the longest leaf stalk (petiole) of each plant was measured. • The number of feeding scars on the second youngest leaf (leaf 2) of each plant was counted. Each group was then given a different treatment, as shown in Table 2.1. Table 2.1 group treatment 1 not sprayed with insecticide no weevils added 2 not sprayed with insecticide 1 mating pair of weevils added after 1 week 3 sprayed with insecticide no weevils added 1 mating pair of weevils added 1 week after

Question

sprayed with insecticide spraying with insecticide 1 mating pair of weevils added 2 weeks after

Question

sprayed with insecticide spraying with insecticide 1 mating pair of weevils added 3 weeks after

Question

sprayed with insecticide spraying with insecticide After 4 weeks, the effects of the treatments on water hyacinth were assessed. The results are shown in Table 2.2. Table 2.2 mean length of longest mean number of feeding petiole / cm ± s scars on leaf 2 ± s group before after before after treatment treatment treatment treatment 1 41 ± 2.0 38 ± 3.0 23 ± 4.0 0 2 32 ± 3.5 29 ± 3.3 16 ± 3.0 22 ± 5.0 3 36 ± 2.0 35 ± 3.8 18 ± 4.0 0.5 ± 0.2 4 38 ± 2.0 36 ± 3.0 30 ± 9.0 0.5 ± 0.2 5 34 ± 2.5 31 ± 3.5 25 ± 5.0 0.5 ± 0.2 6 37 ± 3.8 35 ± 4.3 13 ± 3.5 1.0 ± 0.5 (a) (i) Explain the reason for spraying the water hyacinth plants with insecticide in treatment 3. …… [2] (ii) Explain why treatment 2 and treatments 4, 5 and 6 were included in the experiment. treatment 2 …… treatments 4, 5 and 6 …… [2] (iii) Explain what the standard deviation (s) shows about the results in Table 2.2. …… [2] (iv) State one conclusion that can be made from the results in Table 2.2. …… [1] Stage 2: Field experiment • 10 plots, each of 20 m2, were marked out in a river. • The plots were filled with water hyacinth plants. • The plants were sampled at the start and the mean petiole length and number of feeding scars were recorded, as in the pilot experiment. • 5 of the plots were sprayed with insecticide every three weeks. • 5 of the plots were not sprayed, to allow weevils from the environment to feed on the plants. • The plants were sampled after 33 weeks and the mean petiole length and number of feeding scars were recorded, as in the pilot experiment. The results of the field experiment are shown in Fig. 2.1 and Fig. 2.2. 100 90 80 70 mean length of 60 longest petiole / cm 50 40 30 20 10 0 start after 33 weeks time Key not sprayed with insecticide sprayed with insecticide every three weeks Fig. 2.1 30 25 20 mean number of feeding scars 15 on leaf 2 10 5 0 start after 33 weeks time Key not sprayed with insecticide sprayed with insecticide every three weeks Fig. 2.2 (b) (i) Calculate the percentage change in the mean length of the longest petiole for leaves sprayed with insecticide. Show your working and give your answer to the nearest whole number. ……% [2] (ii) State one reason why the t-test can be used to analyse the data in Fig. 2.2. …… [1] (iii) State what information is needed to calculate the degrees of freedom used to determine if the calculated t-value is significant. …… [1] [Total: 11]

Question

In the question paper above.