Economics 9708/42 October/November 2021: question paper and mark scheme
Cambridge AS & A Level Economics (9708), Paper 4 Data Response and Essays, October/November 2021. Read both free below, or download them. Done the paper? Get it marked by AI against this mark scheme.
Competition in the skies over Europe
In the sixteen months to April 2019 thirteen airlines ceased trading in Europe. This reflected a global trend where small airlines found it increasingly difficult to compete against large airlines, which have continued to grow.
Large airlines charge a price for a flight that includes meals and entertainment for passengers.
Smaller airlines charge a price for the flight only and passengers need to pay extra for other services such as meals.
Large airlines benefit from economies of scale. Without these cost-reductions some smaller airlines have gone bankrupt.
The reduction in the number of airlines has not reduced the overcapacity in the market because the aircrew and aircraft of the bankrupt airlines were acquired by the remaining companies, which have developed into super-airlines. This has left passengers with fewer airlines to choose from and more expensive fares. It was predicted that this would lead to an increase in the market share for the top five European airlines from 50% of the European market in 2019 to match the top five
United States (US) airlines, which control 77% of the US market.
The development of super-airlines took place at the same time as increasing regulation of the airline market. For example, the European Union (EU) will only grant operating licences for flights between EU countries to an EU airline. This has prevented non-EU airlines from competing on EU routes.
For the super-airlines, large scale is the easy way to avoid the stresses and strains of open competition. For passengers this will lead to higher prices and poorer service.
Sources: adapted from Financial Times, 6 October 2017 and The Economist, 27 April 2019
(a) Using the information, explain the predicted effect of the development of super-airlines on the concentration ratio in the European airline market. [2]
(b) ‘Large airlines benefit from economies of scale.’
With the use of an example and a diagram, explain how a large airline can benefit from economies of scale. [5]
(c) Explain what is meant by a contestable market and discuss how making the airline market more contestable could benefit passengers. [6]
(d) Identify the market structure for airlines in Europe in 2019 following the development of the super-airlines and discuss how airlines may compete in this market structure. [7]
Section B
Answer two questions.
Mark scheme
1(a) Using the information, explain the predicted effect of the development 2
of super-airlines on the concentration ratio in the European airline
market.
• The number of airlines will decrease (1)
• Market share/the concentration ratio will increase/change in control of
top 5 airlines 50 % to 77 % (1)
• The market will become more oligopolistic (1)
2 marks maximum
1(b) ‘Large airlines benefit from economies of scale’ 5
With the use of an example and a diagram, explain how a large airline
can benefit from economies of scale.
• Explanation of economies of scale (1) Example: e.g. technical (1)
leading to falling LRAC (1)
• Diagram the LRAC of the remaining airlines Axes $/Cost and Quantity
(1) Labelled LRAC/LRATC (1)
1(c) Explain what is meant by a contestable market and discuss how 6
making the airline market more contestable could benefit passengers.
• Definition of a contestable market (1): the threat of competition on
existing firms (1), reference to low barriers to entry (1)
• Benefit to passengers: prices, quantity or quality of service 2 examples ×
2 marks
1(d) Identify the market structure for airlines in Europe in 2019 following 7
the development of the super-airlines and discuss how airlines may
compete in this market structure.
• Oligopoly (1)
• Discussion of 3 forms of oligopolistic competitive behaviour, price
cutting, product innovation, advertising and marketing, level of service
(product innovation) 3 × 2 marks.
Discuss whether market failure can be successfully eliminated by governments. [25]
Mark scheme
2 Discuss whether market failure can be successfully eliminated by 25
governments.
Market failure can be caused by lack of imperfect competition with
productive or allocative efficiency failure, imperfect information, externalities
(positive or negative), missing markets/public goods. Reference to allocative
and productive efficiency.
Methods of reducing market failure: indirect taxation or subsidies, direct
provision or legislation.
Problems of government intervention. Lack of information, speed of
response.
L4 (18–25 marks): The analysis of three methods of reducing market failure
and a comment on a government’s success in eliminating market failure. A
conclusion is reached for 22–25 marks.
L3 (14–17 marks): For an answer that analyses two methods of reducing
market failure.
L2 (10–13 marks): For an explanation that analyses one method of
reducing market failure or describes two methods of reducing market failure.
L1 (1–9 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
(a) Use marginal utility analysis to explain the derivation of the individual demand curve for a good. [12]
(b) Use indifference curve analysis to discuss whether the demand curve for a good will always slope downwards. [13]
Mark scheme
3(a) Use marginal utility analysis to explain the derivation of the individual 12
demand curve for good
Marginal utility analysis:
Explanation of total utility(TU) and marginal utility (MU) and falling MU.
Link to ratio of MUx to Px .
Principle of equi-marginal equality explained. MUx/Px = MUy/Py
Development of the effect of a change in Px on MUx and thus demand by an
individual. Conversion to an individual’s demand curve and then a market
demand curve.
L4 (9–12 marks): For an answer that gives a sound explanation of the
change in equilibrium when the price of one good changes in relation to the
price of another good. The equi-marginal principle is used to analyse this
effect. Extension of individual demand to market demand curve.
Max 9 For individual demand curve with no reference to the market.
L3 (7–8 marks): For an answer that develops the analysis to the equi-
marginal principle in relation to two goods and then attempts to determine
an individual demand curve.
L2 (5–6 marks): For an answer that explains total and marginal utility and
its link to the purchase of one good.
L1 (1–4 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
3(b) Use indifference curve analysis to discuss whether the demand curve 13
for a good will always slope downwards.
Indifference curves, budget lines defined, the effect of shifts in the price and
the budget line. Split of change in quantity demanded into income effect (IE)
and substitution effect (SE). Impact of the size and sign of such changes on
the slope of demand curve.
L4 (9–13 marks): For an answer that discusses the influences of the size
and the sign of the IE and SE on the effect on demand of a change in the
price of a good and recognises this may produce an upwards sloping
demand curve. A conclusion is reached for 12/13 marks.
L3 (7–8 marks): For an answer that analyses the effect of a change of price
on the demand for a good and includes reference to IE/SE.
L2 (5–6 marks): For an answer that describes budget lines and indifference
curves and identifies the equilibrium position.
L1 (1–4 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
(a) Explain the link between diminishing marginal returns and the shape of a firm’s short-run marginal cost curve and short-run average total cost curve. [12]
(b) Discuss whether consumers or producers benefit more from the practice of price discrimination.
[13]
Mark scheme
4(a) Explain the link between diminishing marginal returns and the shape 12
of a firm’s short-run marginal cost curve and short-run total average
total cost curve.
Explanation of diminishing returns in terms of one fixed factor plus
increasing quantities of a variable factor on marginal physical product.
The effect of the change in marginal physical product on the short-run
marginal cost curve. The changes in the short run marginal costs (MC)
determine the shape of the short-run average total cost curve (ATC).
L4 (9–12 marks): For an answer that gives a clear explanation of
diminishing marginal returns and explains the links to the MC. The link
between the short run marginal cost curve and the ATC is determined.
L3 (7–8 marks): For an answer that gives a clear explanation of diminishing
marginal returns and links it to the MC.
L2 (5–6 marks): For an answer that gives a clear explanation of either
diminishing marginal returns or MC and ATC.
L1 (1–4 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
4(b) Discuss whether consumers or producers benefit more from the 13
practice of price discrimination.
Definitions of price discrimination (PD). Explanation of PD. Discussion of the
impact of PD on both the consumer and the producer.
L4 (9–13 marks): For an answer that explains fully when price
discrimination can occur and discusses the impact on both the consumer
and producer. A conclusion is reached for 12–13 marks.
L3 (7–8 marks): For an answer that gives a limited explanation of when
price discrimination can occur with a limited analysis of its impact.
L2 (5–6 marks): For an answer that explains price discrimination.
L1 (1–4 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
Discuss the extent to which gross domestic product (GDP) is a useful measure of living standards and economic development. [25]
Mark scheme
5 Discuss the extent to that gross domestic product (GDP) is a useful 25
measure of living standards and economic development.
Definition of GDP explanation of real GDP per head and its link to
measuring the standard of living (SoL). Explanation of economic
development (ED). A comment on the relationship between SoL and ED.
Problems of measuring GDP in general and especially in developing
countries.
Relevance of GDP as a measure. Relevance of alternative measures of SoL
HDI, MEW HPI or MPI.
L4 (18–25 marks): For an answer that defines living standards in terms of
real GDP per head and develops an argument that links it to ED. The link
between GDP and SOL and ED is explicitly discussed. Detailed discussions
regarding to the limitations of measuring GDP. A candidate may refer to one
or more alternative measures of measuring GDP. A conclusion is reached
for 22–25 marks.
L3 (14–17 marks): For an answer that defines SoL in terms of real GDP per
head. Some reference is made to the limitations of measuring GDP or one
alternative measure of GDP.
L2 (10–13 marks): For an answer that defines living standards in terms of
real GDP per head of population.
L1 (1–9 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
(a) Explain the difference between frictional unemployment and real wage (classical) unemployment. [12]
(b) Evaluate the policies available to a government to reduce the level of structural unemployment.
[13]
Mark scheme
6(a) Explain the difference between the frictional unemployment and real 12
wage (classical) unemployment.
Definition of frictional unemployment and explanation of how it is temporary
as workers leave their job or are dismissed and are searching for another
job. Real wage unemployment due to the exercise of trade union
power/minimum wage legislation to raise the wage rate above the
equilibrium wage.
L4 (9–12 marks): For an answer that explains both forms of unemployment
and the difference is made clear.
L3 (7–8 marks): For an answer that explains one form of unemployment
and the other form is described.
L2 (5–6 marks): For an answer that explains one form of unemployment is
or both forms of unemployment are described.
L1 (1–4 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
6(b) Evaluate the policies available to a government to reduce the level of 13
structural unemployment.
Definition of structural unemployment. Supply side policies: education and
training, reduced corporation tax allowing more growth and employment,
increased minimum wage acts as an incentive to work, subsidies for
housing costs, reduction of trade union power.
Aspects of fiscal policy relevant to structural unemployment can be
accepted e.g. tariffs.
L4 (9–13 marks): For an answer that evaluates three policies available to a
government to reduce structural unemployment.
L3 (7–8 marks): For an answer that explains two policies to reduce
structural unemployment and a limited attempt to evaluate is made
L2 (5–6 marks): For an answer that explains one policy to reduce structural
unemployment.
L1 (1–4 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
(a) Explain the quantity theory of money and consider its relevance for a country’s macroeconomic policy. [12]
(b) Discuss whether fiscal policy alone can promote a more equal distribution of income. [13]
Mark scheme
7(a) Explain the quantity theory of money and consider its relevance for a 12
country’s macroeconomic policy.
Definition of the 4 terms PTM and V in the QTM. Explanation of the
interaction of the terms of PT=MV and the implications of changes in money
supply M on price level P. The relevance for macroeconomic policy is
considered e.g. a reduction in the rate of inflation.
L4 (9–12 marks): For an answer that defines the terms of and explains the
meaning of QTM clearly and understands it as a theory of prices/inflation.
The assumptions of the theory are identified. Its relevance to
macroeconomic policy.
L3 (7–8 marks): For an answer that defines the terms of and explains the
meaning of QTM clearly and understands it as a theory of prices/inflation or
the assumptions of the theory are identified.
L2 (5–6 marks): For an answer that describes the meaning of the terms in
the QTM clearly and makes an attempt to link the theory to inflation.
L1 (1–4 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
7(b) Discuss whether fiscal policy alone can promote a more equal 13
distribution of income.
Definition and explanation of a more equal distribution of income.
Definition of fiscal policy. Explanation of effects of taxation in terms of
reducing income of the rich and the effect of government spending on the
poor. Discussion of redistributive effects on rich and poor of fiscal changes.
L4 (9–13 marks): For an answer that provides an explanation of the
meaning of a more equal distribution of income. A clear discussion of three
policies that may promote a more equal distribution of income. A conclusion
is reached for 12/13 marks.
L3 (7–8 marks): For an answer that provides an explanation of the meaning
of a more equal income distribution. A clear analysis of two policies that may
promote a more equal income distribution.
L2 (5–6 marks): For an answer that makes a statement of the meaning of a
more equal income distribution and a description a policy that may promote
a more equal distribution of income.
L1 (1–4 marks): For an answer that has some basic correct facts but
includes irrelevancies. Errors of theory or omissions of analysis will be
substantial.
Note: Answers be rewarded at the appropriate level if candidates refer to
relevant monetary and supply side policies that promote a more equal
distribution of income.
Checked your answers against these? Let AI mark the whole paper, on your own working.
Examiners follow the generic marking principles at the front of the scheme, then each question's points: method (M), accuracy (A) and independent (B) marks, error carried forward where the scheme allows it, and positive marking, so you're credited for what you got right.
Check your answers against it
Done this paper? Upload your script and CIE Buddy's AI marker marks it question by question against this exact scheme, puts the ticks on your own working and says what each lost mark needed.
Where can I find the 9708/42 October/November 2021 mark scheme?+
On this page, free: the mark scheme for AS & A Level Economics 9708/42, October/November 2021 (9708_w21_ms_42), and the question paper (9708_w21_qp_42), to read or download, with each question's marking points written out underneath.
How many marks is 9708/42 out of?+
Economics 9708/42 for October/November 2021 is out of 70 marks, with 2 hours 15 minutes to answer it.
Can I get my 9708/42 answers marked?+
Yes. Upload your answers to 9708/42/O/N/21 as a PDF or photos, and CIE Buddy marks every question against this paper's official mark scheme, using Cambridge's marking rules. You get your score, each lost mark explained on your own script, and the topics to revise. It's a guide, not an official Cambridge grade.